The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Remote sensing based assessment of hazards from glacier lake outbursts: a case study in the Swiss Alps
Open accessAbstract
Glacier lakes are a common phenomenon in high mountain areas. Outbursts from glacier lakes have repeatedly caused the loss of human lives as well as severe damage to local infrastructure. In several high mountain ranges around the world, a grave uncertainty about the hazard potential of glacier lakes still exists, especially with respect to the effects of accelerating rates of glacier retreat as a consequence of atmospheric warming. Area-wide detection and modeling of glacier lake hazard potentials is, therefore, a major challenge. In this study, an approach integrating three scale levels allows for the progressive focus on critical glacier lakes. Remote sensing methods for application in glacier lake hazard assessment are presented, and include channel indexing, data fusion, and change detection. Each method matches the requirements of a certain scale level. For estimating potential disaster amplitudes, assessments must be made of maximum discharge and runout distance of outbursts floods and debris flows. Existing empirical relations are evaluated and complementary ones as derived from available data are proposed. Tests with observations from a recent outburst event from a moraine-dammed lake in the Swiss Alps show the basic applicability of the proposed techniques and the usefulness of empirical relations for first hazard assessments. In particular, the observed runout distance of the debris flow resulting from the outburst does not exceed the empirically estimated maximum runout distance. A list of decision criteria and related remote sensing techniques are discussed in conclusion. Such a list is an essential tool for evaluating the hazard potential of a lake. A systematic application of remote sensing based methods for glacier lake hazard assessment is recommended.Key words: glacier lake outburst, hazard potential, remote sensing, empirical parameters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Landsat-based inventory of glaciers in western Canada, 1985–2005
Bolch, T., Menounos, B., & Wheate, R. (2010) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.015 · Cited by 567
Proglacial lakes: character, behaviour and geological importance
Carrivick, J. L., & Tweed, F. S. (2013) · Quaternary Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.07.028 · Cited by 493
Kääb, A. (2002) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/s0924-2716(02)00114-4 · Cited by 371
Self-citationAn assessment procedure for glacial hazards in the Swiss Alps
Huggel, C., Haeberli, W., Kääb, A., Bieri, D., & Richardson, S. (2004) · Canadian Geotechnical Journal · doi:10.1139/t04-053 · Cited by 357
Self-citationAllen, S. K., Rastner, P., Arora, M., Huggel, C., & Stoffel, M. (2016) · Landslides · doi:10.1007/s10346-015-0584-3 · Cited by 342
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Huggel, C., Kääb, A., Haeberli, W., Teysseire, P., & Paul, F.
- Venue
- Canadian Geotechnical Journal
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 2002-04-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 316-330
- ISSN
- 0008-3674 (ISSN-L)
- 1208-6010
- OpenAlex
- W2006919898
- Cited by
- 618
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Remote sensing based assessment of hazards from glacier lake outbursts: a case study in the Swiss Alps. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/t01-099
- The paper
- Huggel, C., Kääb, A., Haeberli, W., Teysseire, P., & Paul, F. (2002). Remote sensing based assessment of hazards from glacier lake outbursts: a case study in the Swiss Alps. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1139/t01-099
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.