The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Charcoal production, dispersal, and deposition from the Fort Providence experimental fire: interpreting fire regimes from charcoal records in boreal forests
Abstract
The relationship between charcoal production from fires and charcoal deposition in lakes is poorly understood, which limits the interpretation of sediment charcoal records. This calibration study assessed charcoal particle production, size, and transport during the International Crown Fire Modelling Experiment (ICFME) and compared fossil charcoal particle accumulation from 16 lakes in boreal forests of North America. Particle accumulation averaged 20.1 mm 2·cm2 inside the ICFME fire; accumulation declined sharply outside the fire, with only 1% of the measured particles transported beyond 20 m from the burn edge. Fossil charcoal accumulation during the past 9000 years was much lower than observed deposition in traps located within the ICFME fire but similar to airborne deposition in traps located 1060 m from the burn edge. A higher fraction of large diameter particles (>1 mm) was present in fossil charcoal accumulation from historical fires and charcoal peaks that exceeded background accumulation by 1.4 times, suggesting large particles are characteristic of nearby fires. On the basis of a charred-particle production of ~2% of the total fuel consumed by the ICFME fire, we estimate a potential long-term carbon sequestration of 58.2 ± 12 g C·m2 as charred particles from this fire stored in soils or lake sediments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis
Silverman, B. W. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315140919 · Cited by 15,796
Biomass Burning in the Tropics: Impact on Atmospheric Chemistry and Biogeochemical Cycles
Crutzen, P. J., & Andreae, M. O. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.250.4988.1669 · Cited by 2,487
Seiler, W., & Crutzen, P. J. (1980) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/bf00137988 · Cited by 1,365
Black carbon in soils and sediments: Analysis, distribution, implications, and current challenges
Schmidt, M. W. I., & Noack, A. G. (2000) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/1999gb001208 · Cited by 1,334
Clark, J. S. (1988) · Quaternary Research · doi:10.1016/0033-5894(88)90088-9 · Cited by 811
Self-citationPiston Corers for Peat and Lake Sediments
Wright, H. E., Mann, D. H., & Glaser, P. H. (1984) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1941430 · Cited by 487
A 9000-year fire history from the Oregon Coast Range, based on a high-resolution charcoal study
Long, C. J., Whitlock, C., Bartlein, P. J., & Millspaugh, S. H. (1998) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/x98-051 · Cited by 437
Whitlock, C., & Millspaugh, S. H. (1996) · The Holocene · doi:10.1177/095968369600600102 · Cited by 416
Seasonality in CO2 and H2O flux at an eastern Amazonian rain forest
Carswell, F. E., Costa, A. L., Palheta, M., Malhi, Y., Meir, P., Costa, J. D. P. R., Ruivo, M. D. L., Leal, L. D. S. M., Costa, J. M. N., Clement, R. J., et al. (2002) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2000jd000284 · Cited by 403
Ohlson, M., & Tryterud, E. (2000) · The Holocene · doi:10.1191/095968300667442551 · Cited by 392
Cited by
Higuera, P. E., Brubaker, L. B., Anderson, P. M., Hu, F. S., & Brown, T. A. (2009) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/07-2019.1 · Cited by 613
Anticipating the consequences of climate change for Canada’s boreal forest ecosystems
Price, D. T., Alfaro, R. I., Brown, K. J., Flannigan, M. D., Fleming, R. A., Hogg, E. H., Girardin, M. P., Lakusta, T., Johnston, M., McKenney, D. W., et al. (2013) · Environmental Reviews · doi:10.1139/er-2013-0042 · Cited by 599
Charcoal recognition, taphonomy and uses in palaeoenvironmental analysis
Scott, A. C. (2010) · Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology · doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2009.12.012 · Cited by 527
Forbes, M. S., Raison, R. J., & Skjemstad, J. O. (2006) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.06.007 · Cited by 511
Théry-Parisot, I., Chabal, L., & Chrzavzez, J. (2010) · Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology · doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2009.09.016 · Cited by 444
Metadata
- Authors
- Lynch, J. A., Clark, J. S., & Stocks, B. J.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Forest Research
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 2004-08-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1642-1656
- ISSN
- 0045-5067 (ISSN-L)
- 1208-6037
- OpenAlex
- W2011352468
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 9.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Charcoal production, dispersal, and deposition from the Fort Providence experimental fire: interpreting fire regimes from charcoal records in boreal forests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/x04-071
- The paper
- Lynch, J. A., Clark, J. S., & Stocks, B. J. (2004). Charcoal production, dispersal, and deposition from the Fort Providence experimental fire: interpreting fire regimes from charcoal records in boreal forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. https://doi.org/10.1139/x04-071
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
