The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do chestnut, northern red, and white oak germinant seedlings respond similarly to light treatments? Growth and biomass
Abstract
Northern red oak ( Quercus rubra L.) seedling growth has been extensively studied. White oak ( Quercus alba L.) and chestnut oak ( Quercus prinus L.), however, are far less investigated despite their importance among upland oak species in eastern North American forests. We characterized white and chestnut oak seedling response to light and available soil nutrients while using northern red oak as a benchmark. Germinants were grown within one of three shade treatments (25%, 18%, and 6% of full sun) in one of two native forest soil mixes over two growing seasons. Leaf area, shoot mass, and root mass of all three species showed positive growth responses to increasing light. Growth and biomass were higher for all species grown in the more nutrient-rich forest soil, but chestnut oak displayed the greatest positive responses to the higher nutrient levels. White oak seedlings were the slowest growers and demonstrated the most root-centered growth, with root to shoot ratios almost twice that of either chestnut or northern red oak seedlings. The oak species evaluated here responded differently to changes in resource availability. Our study demonstrates the differential response of upland oaks to low light and nutrients. These differences need consideration when developing oak management prescriptions for specific oaks.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“which could be due to its response to greater amounts of nutrients and water [43].”
From Early Tree Growth in Reclaimed Mine Soils in Appalachia USA (2019) · cites this paper as [43]
Citations
Cites
The Mineral Nutrition of Wild Plants
Chapin, F. S. (1980) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.001313 · Cited by 4,364
Seeds of woody plants in the United States
Schopmeyer, C. S. (1974) · Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) · Cited by 804
The ecology and silviculture of oaks
(2002) · CABI Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1079/9780851995700.0000 · Cited by 589
Burns, R. M. (1990) · Cited by 354
Reproductive Mode and Mechanisms for Self-Replacement of Northern Red Oak (Quercus rubra) - A Review
Crow, T. R. (1988) · Forest Science · doi:10.1093/forestscience/34.1.19 · Cited by 350
Bringing Fire Back: The Changing Regimes of the Appalachian Mixed-Oak Forests
Brose, P. H., Schuler, T. M., Lear, D. V., & Berst, J. (2001) · Journal of Forestry · doi:10.1093/jof/99.11.30 · Cited by 279
Hutchinson, T. F., Sutherland, E. K., & Yaussy, D. A. (2005) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.07.011 · Cited by 231
The ecology and silviculture of oaks
(2009) · CABI eBooks · doi:10.1079/9781845934743.0000 · Cited by 217
Co‐Occurring Tree Species Change Rank in Seedling Performance with Resources Varied Experimentally
Latham, R. E. (1992) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1941461 · Cited by 190
Abrams, M. D., & Downs, J. A. (1990) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/x90-250 · Cited by 156
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Brose P., 2001, J. For., 99, 30
- Crow T.R., 1988, For. Sci., 34, 19
- Farmer R.E., 1975, For. Sci., 21, 373
- Loftis D.L., 1990, For. Sci., 36, 908
- McQuilkin, R.A. 1990.Quercus prinusL. Chestnut oak.InSilvics of North America. Vol. 2. Hardwoods.Edited byR.M. Burns and B.H. Honkala. U.S. Dep. Agric. Agric. Handb. 654. pp. 721–726.
- Rebbeck J., 2001, Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am., 86, 184
- Rogers, R. 1990.Quercus albaL. White oak.InSilvics of North America. Vol. 2. Hardwoods.Edited byR.M. Burns and B.H. Honkala. U.S. Dep. Agric. Agric. Handb. 654. pp. 605–613.
- SAS Institute Inc. 2008. SAS user’s guide, release 9.2 edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Poorter, H., Niinemets, Ü., Ntagkas, N., Siebenkäs, A., Mäenpää, M., Matsubara, S., & Pons, T. L. (2019) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.15754 · Cited by 606
Underplanting to sustain future stocking of oak (Quercus) in temperate deciduous forests
Dey, D. C., Gardiner, E. S., Schweitzer, C. J., Kabrick, J. M., & Jacobs, D. F. (2012) · New Forests · doi:10.1007/s11056-012-9330-z · Cited by 96
Hutchinson, T. F., Yaussy, D. A., Long, R. P., Rebbeck, J., & Sutherland, E. K. (2012) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2012.08.036 · Cited by 94
Self-citationSercu, B. K., Baeten, L., Coillie, F. V., Martel, A., Lens, L., Verheyen, K., & Bonte, D. (2017) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.3528 · Cited by 86
Repeated prescribed fires alter gap-phase regeneration in mixed-oak forests
Hutchinson, T. F., Long, R. P., Rebbeck, J., Sutherland, E. K., & Yaussy, D. A. (2012) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/x11-184 · Cited by 77
Self-citationMiller, G. W., Brose, P. H., & Gottschalk, K. W. (2016) · Journal of Forestry · doi:10.5849/jof.16-002 · Cited by 60
Self-citationKuehne, C., Nosko, P., Horwath, T., & Bauhus, J. (2014) · Tree Physiology · doi:10.1093/treephys/tpt124 · Cited by 49
Afforestation, restoration and regeneration — Not all trees are created equal
Lawson, S. S., & Michler, C. H. (2014) · Journal of Forestry Research · doi:10.1007/s11676-014-0426-5 · Cited by 41
Rebbeck, J., Scherzer, A. J., & Gottschalk, K. W. (2012) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/x2012-057 · Cited by 36
Self-citationSeven-Year Effects of Midstory Removal on Natural and Underplanted Oak Reproduction
Parrott, D. L., Lhotka, J. M., Stringer, J. W., & Dillaway, D. N. (2012) · Northern Journal of Applied Forestry · doi:10.5849/njaf.12-001 · Cited by 32
Brose, P. H., & Rebbeck, J. (2016) · Journal of Forestry · doi:10.5849/jof.15-155 · Cited by 32
Self-citationBrown, C. E., Mickelbart, M. V., & Jacobs, D. F. (2014) · Tree Physiology · doi:10.1093/treephys/tpu094 · Cited by 27
Early Tree Growth in Reclaimed Mine Soils in Appalachia USA
Dallaire, K., & Skousen, J. (2019) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f10070549 · Cited by 24
“in mulched mine soils (BR-M) had better height growth than BR-B (25% greater), which could be due to its response to greater amounts of nutrients and water [43].”
BackgroundPatterson, C. P., Hackworth, Z. J., Lhotka, J. M., & Stringer, J. W. (2021) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119871 · Cited by 21
Samuelson, L. J., & Stokes, T. A. (2012) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f3030684 · Cited by 19
Managing forward while looking back: reopening closed forests to open woodlands and savannas
Pile, L. S., Dey, D. C., Stambaugh, M. C., Thompson, F. R. I., & Varner, J. M. (2024) · Fire Ecology · doi:10.1186/s42408-024-00312-9 · Cited by 18
Schweitzer, C. J., Dey, D. C., & Wang, Y. (2019) · Forest Science · doi:10.1093/forsci/fxz031 · Cited by 21
Pile, L. S., Snell, R. S., Vickers, L. A., Hutchinson, T. F., Kabrick, J. M., Jenkins, M. A., Graham, B. D., & Rebbeck, J. (2021) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119513 · Cited by 17
Self-citationOak symposium: sustaining oak forests in the 21st century through science-based management
Clark, S. L., & Schweitzer, C. J. (2019) · doi:10.2737/srs-gtr-237 · Cited by 17
Facilitating Oak and Hickory Regeneration in Mature Central Hardwood Forests
Holzmueller, E. J., Groninger, J. W., & Ruffner, C. M. (2014) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f5123344 · Cited by 13
The long-term case for partial-cutting over clear-cutting in the southern Appalachians USA
Elliott, K. J., Miniat, C. F., & Medenblik, A. S. (2019) · New Forests · doi:10.1007/s11056-019-09731-y · Cited by 12
Interactive effects of large herbivores and climate on California oak seedling outcomes
Parsons, J., Motta, C. I., Sehgal, G., Kuile, A. M., Young, H. S., & Orr, D. A. (2021) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119650 · Cited by 12
Brown, C. E., Bailey, B. G., Saunders, M. R., & Jacobs, D. F. (2014) · Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1093/forestry/cpu014 · Cited by 9
Petersson, L. K., Löf, M., Jensen, A. M., Chastain, D. R., & Gardiner, E. S. (2019) · New Forests · doi:10.1007/s11056-019-09762-5 · Cited by 8
Beasley, C., Carter, D. R., Coates, T. A., Keyser, T. L., & Greenberg, C. H. (2022) · The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society · doi:10.3159/torrey-d-21-00031.1 · Cited by 7
Han, X., Liang, X., Ma, S., Wang, Y., & Lu, X. (2022) · Trees · doi:10.1007/s00468-022-02313-0 · Cited by 7
Nosko, P., Moreau, K., Kuehne, C., Major, K. C., & Bauhus, J. (2021) · Journal of Forestry Research · doi:10.1007/s11676-021-01397-7 · Cited by 6
Magnoux, A., Cogliastro, A., & Paquette, A. (2017) · New Forests · doi:10.1007/s11056-017-9619-z · Cited by 6
Effect of growing season fire timing on oak regeneration
Turner, M. A., Bones, J. T., Marshall, S. G., & Harper, C. A. (2025) · Fire Ecology · doi:10.1186/s42408-025-00350-x · Cited by 5
White Oak Sapling Dynamics Across the Eastern Us: Quantifying a Bottleneck to Sustainability
Vickers, L. A., & Goff, T. C. (2025) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2025.123232 · Cited by 5
Effects of Mineral Soil and Forest Floor on the Regeneration of Pedunculate Oak, Beech and Red Oak
Groote, S. D., Vanhellemont, M., Baeten, L., Carón, M. M., Martel, A., Bonte, D., Lens, L., & Verheyen, K. (2018) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f9020066 · Cited by 5
Rudolph, A. J., McCarthy, B. C., Hutchinson, T. F., & Snell, R. S. (2025) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122656 · Cited by 4
Bourbon Barrels and Bottlenecks: a Nuanced Look at Thirty Years of White Oak Population Dynamics
Vickers, L. A., Knapp, B. O., Goff, T., Brandeis, T. J., Lhotka, J. M., Morin, R. S., Sena, K. L., & Stringer, J. W. (2025) · Journal of Forestry · doi:10.1007/s44392-025-00047-8 · Cited by 3
Miller, G. W., Brose, P. H., Kochenderfer, J. D., Kochenderfer, J. N., Gottschalk, K. W., & Denning, J. R. (2016) · Cited by 1
Self-citationPlaugher, P., & Schuler, J. L. (2024) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122701 · Cited by 3
Goldsmith, C. D., Alexander, H. D., Granger, J. J., & Siegert, C. M. (2023) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2023.120984 · Cited by 2
Natvik, M., & Henry, H. A. L. (2021) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119350 · Cited by 1
Will “Tall Oaks from Little Acorns Grow”? White Oak (Quercus alba) Biology in the Anthropocene
Abbott, A. G., Staton, M. E., Lhotka, J. M., DeWald, L. E., Zhebentyayeva, T. N., Kapoor, B., Thomas, A., Larson, D. A., Hadziabdic, Ð., DeBolt, S., et al. (2024) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f15020269 · Cited by 3
Olichney, J. A., Newhouse, A. E., Franklin, M. Z., Holliday, J. A., Klopf, S. K., Powell, W. A., Stehman, S. V., & Drake, J. E. (2025) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2025.123302 · Cited by 1
Huffman, A. L., Knapp, B. O., & Dey, D. C. (2026) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2026.124059 · Cited by 1
Regeneration and Growth following Silvicultural Treatments in a Productive Central Hardwood Forest
Inglis, E. N., Holzmueller, E. J., Ruffner, C. M., & Groninger, J. W. (2023) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f14061222 · Cited by 1
Effects of light availability and herbivory on planted white oak (Quercus alba) seedlings and acorns
Huffman, A. (2022) · doi:10.32469/10355/94011 · Cited by 1
Peltier, D. M. P. (2013) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan)
EFFECTS OF MIDSTORY REMOVAL AND SHOOT CLIPPING ON THE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF THREE OAK SPECIES
Craig, J. M. (2012) · UKnowledge (University of Kentucky)
Promoting natural regeneration of oak by manipulating disturbance
Petersson, L. K. (2019) · Epsilon Open Archive (Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet biblioteket (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences))
Silviculture to restore oak woodlands and savannas
Dey, D. C., Knapp, B. O., & Stambaugh, M. C. (2019)
Tomlinson, K. A. (2017) · The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) · doi:10.33915/etd.6818
Response of Live Oak Regeneration to Planting Density, Fertilizer, and Mulch
Innusa, B. N., Burney, O. T., & Jacobs, D. F. (2024) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f15091594
Plaugher, P. (2025) · The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) · doi:10.33915/etd.12756
Plaugher, P., Schuler, J. L., & Stephan, K. (2025) · Journal of Forestry · doi:10.1007/s44392-025-00055-8
Metadata
- Authors
- Rebbeck, J., Gottschalk, K., & Scherzer, A.
- Affiliations
- US Forest Service (US)
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Forest Research
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2219-2230
- ISSN
- 0045-5067 (ISSN-L)
- 1208-6037
- OpenAlex
- W2145027217
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 3.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Forest Research (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- U.S. Forest Service
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Seedling growth and survival studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest ecology and management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Seed Germination and Physiology
- Keywords
- chestnut oak, Quercus prinus, Quercus alba, Quercus rubra, light availability, shade tolerance, soil nutrients, seedling growth, biomass allocation, root-shoot ratio, upland oak
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review