The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Estimation of root biomass and dynamics for the carbon budget model of the Canadian forest sector
Abstract
Root biomass is expected to contribute significantly to total ecosystem carbon (C) pools and their dynamics. A method for estimating belowground biomass pools and their dynamics was developed for application in the carbon budget model of the Canadian forest sector (CBM-CFS2). Root biomass data for temperate and boreal softwood and hardwood species were compiled from the literature. Total root biomass for softwood and hardwood species was estimated using regression models that incorporate total aboveground biomass as the independent variable. Fine root biomass was estimated as a proportion of total root biomass using a single regression model for softwood and hardwood species combined. A regression model to estimate annual fine root production was derived for softwood and hardwood species. In the CBM-CFS2, net increments of total biomass were estimated using empirical growth functions to predict aboveground biomass. The regression models developed in this study were then used to predict the corresponding root biomass. Total root production was calculated as the sum of net increments, i.e., the change in root biomass per hectare plus annual turnover. The application of this approach to estimate root biomass pools and their dynamics in the CBM-CFS2 is demonstrated. As with all regression models that are developed from regional databases, this approach should not be used to predict root biomass and dynamics of an individual forest ecosystem, because the influence of species, site, and stand characteristics may lead to significant deviations from the regional averages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Root biomass allocation in the world's upland forests
Cairns, M. A., Brown, S., Helmer, E. H., & Baumgardner, G. A. (1997) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s004420050201 · Cited by 1,622
Bolinder, M. A., Janzen, H. H., Gregorich, E. G., Angers, D. A., & VandenBygaart, A. J. (2007) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.013 · Cited by 731
A 70-year retrospective analysis of carbon fluxes in the Canadian forest sector
Kurz, W. A., & Apps, M. J. (1999) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0526:ayraoc]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 680
Self-citationHooker, T. D., & Compton, J. E. (2003) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0299:fecana]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 329
Carbon in Canada’s boreal forest — A synthesis
Kurz, W. A., Shaw, C. H., Boisvenue, C., Stinson, G., Metsaranta, J., Leckie, D., Dyk, A., Smyth, C., & Neilson, E. T. (2013) · Environmental Reviews · doi:10.1139/er-2013-0041 · Cited by 327
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kurz, W. A., Beukema, S. J., & Apps, M. J.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Forest Research
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1996-11-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1973-1979
- ISSN
- 0045-5067 (ISSN-L)
- 1208-6037
- OpenAlex
- W2000288244
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimation of root biomass and dynamics for the carbon budget model of the Canadian forest sector. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/x26-223
- The paper
- Kurz, W. A., Beukema, S. J., & Apps, M. J. (1996). Estimation of root biomass and dynamics for the carbon budget model of the Canadian forest sector. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. https://doi.org/10.1139/x26-223
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.