Height of Crown Scorch in Forest Fires
Abstract
A relation between fire behavior and crown scorch height is derived from measurements on 13 experimental outdoor fires. The range of data includes fire intensities from 16 to 300 kcal/s-m, and scorch heights from 2 to 17 m. The results agree with established theory that scorch height varies with the 2/3 power of line-fire intensity. The effects of air temperature and wind speed on scorch height are treated as well. The derived relations could be useful to those interested in prescribed burning under a crown canopy, ecological response of trees to fires of varying intensity, and timber losses following forest fires.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Modelling fire behaviour began with the work of Rothermel (1972) and Van Wagner (1973) and has improved over time, including coupling with dynamic vegetation and/or Earth System models spanning a wide range of spatial and temporal scales.
“Modelling fire behaviour began with the work of (Rothermel, 1972) and (Van Wagner, 1973) and has improved over time (Table S2), including coupling with dynamic vegetation and/or Earth System models spanning a wide range of spatial and temporal scales.”
From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Van Wagner, 1973
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers
McLauchlan, K. K., Higuera, P. E., Miesel, J., Rogers, B. M., Schweitzer, J., Shuman, J. K., Tepley, A. J., Varner, J. M., Veblen, T. T., Adalsteinsson, S. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13403 · Cited by 729 · see citing works
“Modelling fire behaviour began with the work of (Rothermel, 1972) and (Van Wagner, 1973) and has improved over time (Table S2), including coupling with dynamic vegetation and/or Earth System models spanning a wide range of spatial and temporal scales.”
The challenge of quantitative risk analysis for wildland fire
Finney, M. A. (2005) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.010 · Cited by 451 · see citing works
Wotton, B. M. (2009) · Environmental and Ecological Statistics · doi:10.1007/s10651-007-0084-2 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Stand- and landscape-level effects of prescribed burning on two Arizona wildfires
Finney, M. A., McHugh, C. W., & Grenfell, I. C. (2005) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/x05-090 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Bellows, R. S., Thomson, A. C., Helmstedt, K. J., York, R. A., & Potts, M. D. (2016) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2016.05.049 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wagner, C. E. V.
- Corresponding author
- Wagner, C. E. Van
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Forest Research
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1973-09-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 373-378
- ISSN
- 0045-5067 (ISSN-L)
- 1208-6037
- OpenAlex
- W2124496174
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 1.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Forest Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Fire dynamics and safety research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
- Keywords
- forest fires, fire intensity, fire behavior, prescribed burning, ambient temperature effects, wind speed effects, timber loss
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review