Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 159

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Estimating shrub biomass from basal stem diameters

Brown, James K.·1976·Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Abstract

For 25 northern Rocky Mountain shrub species, linear regressions are presented for total aboveground weight on basal stem diameter (average r 2 of 0.91) and for leaf weight on basal stem diameter (average r 2 of 0.74). The percentage of stem-wood weight in diameter classes of 0 to 0.5 cm, 0.5 to 2 cm, and 2 to 5 cm varies with basal stem diameter and species growth characteristics (as shown in figures). For these classes, diameters of stem wood averaged 0.21 cm, 0.76 cm, and 2.37 cm, respectively; however, some species differed significantly from these averages. Coefficients of variation ranged from 60 to 340 for shrub weight per unit area sampled in 12 stands. Some distributions were positively skewed. Implications for sampling are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/x76-019

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 159

Metadata

Authors
Brown, J. K.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Forest Research
Published
1976-06-01
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
153-158
ISSN
  • 0045-5067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1208-6037
OpenAlex
W1980634989
Cited by
159
References
0
FWCI
5.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating shrub biomass from basal stem diameters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/x76-019
The paper
Brown, J. K. (1976). Estimating shrub biomass from basal stem diameters. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. https://doi.org/10.1139/x76-019

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.