The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Productivity and nutrient cycling in taiga forest ecosystems
Abstract
This paper considers the productivity and nutrient cycling in examples of the major forest types in interior Alaska. These ecosystem properties are examined from the standpoint of the control exerted over them by soil temperature and forest-floor chemistry. We conclude that black spruce Piceamariana (Mill.) B.S.P. occupies the coldest, wettest sites which support tree growth in interior Alaska. Average seasonal heat sums (1132 ± 32 degree days (DD)) for all other forest types were significantly higher than those encountered for black spruce (640 ± 40 DD). In addition, black spruce ecosystems display the highest average seasonal forest-floor and mineral-soil moisture contents. Forest-floor chemistry interacts with soil temperature in black spruce to produce the most decay-resistant organic matter. In black spruce the material is characterized by the highest lignin content and widest C/N (44) and C/P (404) ratios. Across the range of forest types examined in this study, soil temperature is strongly related to net annual aboveground tree production and the annual tree requirement for N, P, K, Ca, and Mg. Forest floor C/N and C/P ratios are strongly related to annual tree N and P requirement and the C/N ratio to annual tree production. In all cases these controls act to produce, in black spruce, the smallest accumulation of tree biomass, standing crop of elements, annual production, and element requirement in aboveground tree components.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Understory Vegetation Dynamics of North American Boreal Forests
Hart, S. A., & Chen, H. Y. H. (2006) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352680600819286 · Cited by 435
Constraints of Nutrient Availability on Primary Production in Two Alpine Tundra Communities
Bowman, W. D., Theodose, T. A., Schardt, J. C., & Conant, R. T. (1993) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1940854 · Cited by 351
Effects of Moose Browsing on Vegetation and Litter of the Boreal Forest, Isle Royale, Michigan, USA
McInnes, P. F., Naiman, R. J., Pastor, J., & Cohen, Y. (1992) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1941455 · Cited by 334
Seastedt, T. R., & Knapp, A. K. (1993) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285494 · Cited by 199
Metadata
- Authors
- Cleve, K. V., Oliver, L., Schlentner, R., Viereck, L. A., & Dyrness, C. T.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Forest Research
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1983-10-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 747-766
- ISSN
- 0045-5067 (ISSN-L)
- 1208-6037
- OpenAlex
- W1982838022
- Cited by
- 423
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Productivity and nutrient cycling in taiga forest ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/x83-105
- The paper
- Cleve, K. V., Oliver, L., Schlentner, R., Viereck, L. A., & Dyrness, C. T. (1983). Productivity and nutrient cycling in taiga forest ecosystems. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. https://doi.org/10.1139/x83-105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.