The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Uprooting and snapping of trees: structural determinants and ecological consequences
Abstract
The influence of mechanical and architectural properties of trees on growth rates, mortality rates, and relative probabilities of snapping and uprooting were examined on Barro Colorado Island, Republic of Panama. Of 310 fallen trees, 70% snapped, 25% uprooted, and 5% broke off at ground level. Stepwise discriminant analysis between snapped and uprooted trees indicated that of the variables measured, wood properties were the most important factors determining the type of death in trees. Uprooted trees tended to be larger, shorter for a given stem diameter, and to have denser, stiffer, and stronger wood than snapped trees. There were no significant differences between trees that snapped and trees that uprooted in the extent of buttress development or in the slope of the ground upon which they grew. Trees with low density wood grew faster in stem diameter than those with high density wood but also suffered higher mortality rates. After damage, many of the snapped trees sprouted; small trees sprouted more frequently than large trees. Sprouting is proposed as a means by which weak-wooded fast-growing trees partially compensate for being prone to snapping.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The disturbance of forest ecosystems: the ecological basis for conservative management
Attiwill, P. M. (1994) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/0378-1127(94)90114-7 · Cited by 853
Resprouting as a life history strategy in woody plant communities
Bellingham, P. J., & Sparrow, A. D. (2000) · Oikos · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890224.x · Cited by 773
Corrigendum to : New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide
Pérez-Harguindeguy, N., Díaz, S., Garnier, E., Lavorel, S., Poorter, H., Jaureguiberry, P., Bret-Harte, M. S., Cornwell, W. K., Craine, J. M., Gurvich, D. E., et al. (2016) · Australian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1071/bt12225_co · Cited by 759
ARE FUNCTIONAL TRAITS GOOD PREDICTORS OF DEMOGRAPHIC RATES? EVIDENCE FROM FIVE NEOTROPICAL FORESTS
Poorter, L., Wright, S. J., Paz, H., Ackerly, D. D., Condit, R., Ibarra-Manríquez, G., Harms, K. E., Licona, J. C., Martínez-Ramos, M., Mazer, S. J., et al. (2008) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/07-0207.1 · Cited by 757
Visible and invisible effects of hurricanes on forest ecosystems: an international review
LUGO, A. E. (2008) · Austral Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2008.01894.x · Cited by 503
Metadata
- Authors
- Putz, F. E., Coley, P. D., Lu, K., Montalvo, A., & Aiello, A.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Forest Research
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1983-10-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1011-1020
- ISSN
- 0045-5067 (ISSN-L)
- 1208-6037
- OpenAlex
- W2011460302
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Uprooting and snapping of trees: structural determinants and ecological consequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/x83-133
- The paper
- Putz, F. E., Coley, P. D., Lu, K., Montalvo, A., & Aiello, A. (1983). Uprooting and snapping of trees: structural determinants and ecological consequences. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. https://doi.org/10.1139/x83-133
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.