The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A comparison of methods for determining proximate carbon fractions of forest litter
Abstract
Ten forest litters with decomposition state varying from 16.6 to 100% weight remaining were partitioned into sub-samples; each subsample was analyzed for proximate carbon fractions using one of two chemical analysis procedures (forage fiber and forest products analyses). Proximate carbon fractions from the simpler forage fiber techniques accurately estimated extractives, cellulose, lignin, and acid-hydrolyzed carbohydrates (R 2 > 0.83) determined by the more complex forest products analyses. Decomposition state accounted for most of the residual variance and significantly improved predictive equations for lignin and extractives. The relationship between proximate carbon fractions from the different techniques also varied somewhat among wood, hardwood leaves, and conifer leaves; however, variations were minor relative to the overall trend. Equations developed can be used to extend data availability for developing and validating decomposition models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
LITTER QUALITY AND THE TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY OF DECOMPOSITION
Fierer, N., Craine, J. M., McLauchlan, K., & Schimel, J. P. (2005) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/04-1254 · Cited by 768
Carbohydrate sources and sinks in woody plants
Kozlowski, T. T. (1992) · The Botanical Review · doi:10.1007/bf02858600 · Cited by 706
Parton, W. J., Ojima, D. S., Cole, C. V., & Schimel, D. S. (1994) · SSSA Special Publications · doi:10.2136/sssaspecpub39.c9 · Cited by 620
CARBON, NITROGEN, AND PHOSPHORUS MINERALIZATION IN NORTHERN WETLANDS
Bridgham, S. D., Updegraff, K., & Pastor, J. (1998) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[1545:cnapmi]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 428
Scott, N. A., & Binkley, D. (1997) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s004420050219 · Cited by 338
Metadata
- Authors
- Ryan, M. G., Melillo, J. M., & Ricca, A.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Forest Research
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1990-02-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 166-171
- ISSN
- 0045-5067 (ISSN-L)
- 1208-6037
- OpenAlex
- W2030377988
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of methods for determining proximate carbon fractions of forest litter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/x90-023
- The paper
- Ryan, M. G., Melillo, J. M., & Ricca, A. (1990). A comparison of methods for determining proximate carbon fractions of forest litter. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. https://doi.org/10.1139/x90-023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.