The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Light regimes beneath closed canopies and tree-fall gaps in temperate and tropical forests
Abstract
Light regimes beneath closed canopies and tree-fall gaps are compared for five temperate and tropical forests using fish-eye photography of intact forest canopies and a model for calculating light penetration through idealized gaps. Beneath intact canopies, analyses of canopy photographs indicate that sunflecks potentially contribute 37–68% of seasonal total photosynthetically active radiation. In all of the forests, potential sunfleck duration is brief (4–6 min), but the frequency distributions of potential sunfleck duration vary because of differences in canopy geometry and recent disturbance history. Analysis of the photographs reveals that incidence angles for photosynthetically active radiation beneath closed canopies are not generally vertical for any of the forests, but there was considerable variation both among and within sites in the contribution of overhead versus low-angle lighting. Calculations of light penetration through idealized single-tree gaps in old growth Douglas-fir – hemlock forests indicate that such gaps have little effect on understory light regimes because of the high ratio of canopy height to gap diameter. However, single-tree gaps in the other four forest types produce significant overall increases in understory light levels. There is also significant spatial variation in seasonal total radiation in and around single-tree gaps. Our results demonstrate that there can be significant penetration of light into the understory adjacent to a gap, particularly at high latitudes. As gap size increases, both the mean and the range of light levels within the gap increases, but even in large gaps (ca. 1000 m 2) the potential duration of direct sunlight is generally brief (<4 h). The major differences in gap light regimes of the five forests are largely a function of canopy height and latitude. The effects of latitude should also result in differences in gap light regimes across the geographic range of individual forest types.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The disturbance of forest ecosystems: the ecological basis for conservative management
Attiwill, P. M. (1994) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/0378-1127(94)90114-7 · Cited by 853
Liu, S., Bond-Lamberty, B., Hicke, J. A., Vargas, R., Zhao, S., Chen, J., Edburg, S. L., Hu, Y., Liu, J., McGuire, A. D., et al. (2011) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/2010jg001585 · Cited by 466
Gandhi, K. J. K., & Herms, D. A. (2010) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-009-9627-9 · Cited by 435
Carbohydrate storage enhances seedling shade and stress tolerance in a neotropical forest
MYERS, J. A., & KITAJIMA, K. (2007) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01207.x · Cited by 379
Messier, C., Parent, S., & Bergeron, Y. (1998) · Journal of Vegetation Science · doi:10.2307/3237266 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Canham, C. D., Denslow, J. S., Platt, W. J., Runkle, J. R., Spies, T. A., & White, P. S.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Forest Research
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1990-05-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 620-631
- ISSN
- 0045-5067 (ISSN-L)
- 1208-6037
- OpenAlex
- W2074201701
- Cited by
- 967
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Light regimes beneath closed canopies and tree-fall gaps in temperate and tropical forests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/x90-084
- The paper
- Canham, C. D., Denslow, J. S., Platt, W. J., Runkle, J. R., Spies, T. A., & White, P. S. (1990). Light regimes beneath closed canopies and tree-fall gaps in temperate and tropical forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. https://doi.org/10.1139/x90-084
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.