The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Relationships between litter quality and nitrogen availability in Rocky Mountain forests
Abstract
We assessed the relationships between net nitrogen mineralization, litter quality, and litter decomposition rates in 30 Colorado forests to test three hypotheses of the LINKAGES forest ecosystem model: (i) nitrogen release from litter decay in the forest floor correlates with total (forest floor plus mineral soil) net nitrogen mineralization; (ii) net nitrogen mineralization can be predicted from litter chemistry; and (iii) lignin:nitrogen ratio is the litter quality parameter most closely correlated with decomposition rates. Net nitrogen mineralization was measured for 1 year in 10 stands each of lodgepole pine (Pinuscontorta var. latifolia Engelm.), aspen (Populustremuloides Michx.), and Engelmann spruce–subalpine fir (Piceaengelmannii Parry and Abieslasiocarpa (Hook.) Nutt.), using a sequence of on-site incubations in closed-top tubes. We analyzed foliage litter and fine-root samples for initial concentrations of nitrogen, lignin, carbon, and cellulose, and determined litter mass remaining after 2-, 4-, and 6 months of laboratory decomposition. Net nitrogen mineralization in the forest floor correlated highly with total net nitrogen mineralization both within and across species. Net nitrogen mineralization also correlated significantly with litter quality across species, as did litter mass remaining after each decay period. Initial lignin:nitrogen ratio showed as strong a relationship with net nitrogen mineralization and litter decay rates as any of the litter quality variables assessed. The three tested hypotheses were thus broadly supported in these forest ecosystems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Aerts, R. (1997) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3546886 · Cited by 1,786
White, M. A., Thornton, P. E., Running, S. W., & Nemani, R. R. (2000) · Earth Interactions · doi:10.1175/1087-3562(2000)004<0003:pasaot>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 846
Interactions Between Individual Plant Species and Soil Nutrient Status in Shortgrass Steppe
Vinton, M. A., & Burke, I. C. (1995) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1940920 · Cited by 346
Scott, N. A., & Binkley, D. (1997) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s004420050219 · Cited by 338
Self-citationGlobal-scale latitudinal patterns of plant fine-root nitrogen and phosphorus
Yuan, Z. Y., Chen, H. Y. H., & Reich, P. B. (2011) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1346 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Stump, L. M., & Binkley, D.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Forest Research
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1993-03-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 492-502
- ISSN
- 0045-5067 (ISSN-L)
- 1208-6037
- OpenAlex
- W2036644253
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationships between litter quality and nitrogen availability in Rocky Mountain forests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/x93-067
- The paper
- Stump, L. M., & Binkley, D. (1993). Relationships between litter quality and nitrogen availability in Rocky Mountain forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. https://doi.org/10.1139/x93-067
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.