The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of nitrogen fertilization on the fluxes of N2O, CH4, and CO2 from soils in a Florida slash pine plantation
Abstract
We measured fluxes of N 2 O, CH 4 and CO 2 from control and urea-nitrogen fertilized soils of a mature slash pine (Pinuselliottii var. elliottii Englem.) plantation in Alachua County, Florida. The fertilization did not affect CO 2 emissions, but significantly increased the emissions of N 2 O and lowered the uptake of atmospheric CH 4. Daily average N 2 O emissions from the fertilized soils were 8–600 times higher (12–74 μg N 2 O-N•m−2•h−1) than daily average N 2 O emissions from control soils (0.02–4.0 μg N 2 O-N•m−2•h−1). Daily average CH 4 uptake by the fertilized soils were 5–20 times lower (0.001–0.007 mg CH 4-C•m−2•h−1) than daily average CH 4 uptake by control soils (0.015–0.035 mg CH 4-C•m−2•h−1). We also measured the relative activities of the bacteria populations that were responsible for CH 4 oxidation in the control and fertilized soils. Results from these measurements suggest that fertilization shifted the relative activities of the CH 4 oxidizing bacteria from those dominated by methanotrophs in the control soils to those dominated by nitrifying bacteria in the surface (0–2 cm) of the fertilized soils. The shift in relative activities of these bacteria may have been responsible for the lower CH 4 uptake by the fertilized soils.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Production, oxidation, emission and consumption of methane by soils: A review
Le Mer, J., & Roger, P. (2001) · European Journal of Soil Biology · doi:10.1016/s1164-5563(01)01067-6 · Cited by 2,123
Soil microorganisms as controllers of atmospheric trace gases (H2, CO, CH4, OCS, N2O, and NO)
Conrad, R. (1996) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.60.4.609-640.1996 · Cited by 1,751
Fenn, M. E., Poth, M. A., Aber, J. D., Baron, J. S., Bormann, B. T., Johnson, D. W., Lemly, A. D., McNulty, S. G., Ryan, D. F., & Stottlemyer, R. (1998) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0706:neinae]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 788
Inventorying emissions from nature in Europe
Simpson, D., Winiwarter, W., Börjesson, G., Cinderby, S., Ferreiro, A., Guenther, A., Hewitt, C. N., Janson, R., Khalil, M. A. K., Owen, S., et al. (1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/98jd02747 · Cited by 522
Bowden, R. D., Davidson, E., Savage, K., Arabia, C., & Steudler, P. (2004) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.03.011 · Cited by 477
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Castro, M. S., Peterjohn, W. T., Melillo, J. M., Steudler, P. A., Gholz, H. L., & Lewis, D.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Forest Research
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1994-01-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-13
- ISSN
- 0045-5067 (ISSN-L)
- 1208-6037
- OpenAlex
- W2106859585
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of nitrogen fertilization on the fluxes of N2O, CH4, and CO2 from soils in a Florida slash pine plantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/x94-002
- The paper
- Castro, M. S., Peterjohn, W. T., Melillo, J. M., Steudler, P. A., Gholz, H. L., & Lewis, D. (1994). Effects of nitrogen fertilization on the fluxes of N2O, CH4, and CO2 from soils in a Florida slash pine plantation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. https://doi.org/10.1139/x94-002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.