The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modern quantitative acid–base chemistry
Abstract
Quantitative analysis of ionic solutions in terms of physical and chemical principles has been effectively prohibited in the past by the overwhelming amount of calculation it required, but computers have suddenly eliminated that prohibition. The result is an approach to acid–base which revolutionizes our ability to understand, predict, and control what happens to hydrogen ions in living systems. This review outlines that approach and suggests some of its most useful implications. Quantitative understanding requires distinctions between independent variables (in body fluids: pCO 2, net strong ion charge, and total weak acid, usually protein), and dependent variables ([Formula: see text], [HA], [A−], [Formula: see text], [OH−], and [H+] (or pH)). Dependent variables are determined by independent variables, and can be calculated from the defining equations for the specific system. Hydrogen ion movements between solutions can not affect hydrogen ion concentration; only changes in independent variables can. Many current models for ion movements through membranes will require modification on the basis of this quantitative analysis. Whole body acid–base balance can be understood quantitatively in terms of the three independent variables and their physiological regulation by the lungs, kidneys, gut, and liver. Quantitative analysis also shows that body fluids interact mainly by strong ion movements through the membranes separating them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chowdhury, A. H., Cox, E. F., Francis, S. T., & Lobo, D. N. (2012) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e318256be72 · Cited by 764
Determinants of fat oxidation during exercise in healthy men and women: a cross-sectional study
Venables, M. C., Achten, J., & Jeukendrup, A. E. (2005) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00662.2003 · Cited by 503
Clinical use of lactate monitoring in critically ill patients
Bakker, J., Nijsten, M. W., & Jansen, T. C. (2013) · Annals of Intensive Care · doi:10.1186/2110-5820-3-12 · Cited by 473
Awad, S., Allison, S. P., & Lobo, D. N. (2008) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2008.01.008 · Cited by 295
Kellum, J. A. (2002) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/00003246-200202000-00006 · Cited by 249
Metadata
- Authors
- Stewart, P. A.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1983-12-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1444-1461
- ISSN
- 0008-4212 (ISSN-L)
- 1205-7541
- OpenAlex
- W2084031950
- Cited by
- 1,380
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modern quantitative acid–base chemistry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/y83-207
- The paper
- Stewart, P. A. (1983). Modern quantitative acid–base chemistry. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1139/y83-207
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.