Cited by 212Wildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesRangeland and Wildlife Management

Changes in coyote activity patterns due to reduced exposure to human persecution

Open access
Kitchen, Ann M, Gese, Eric M, Schauster, Edward R·2000·Canadian Journal of Zoology

Abstract

Activity patterns in animals are influenced by a number of factors, including the animal's physiological adaptations, prey availability and distribution, and disturbances caused by predators and humans. We compared coyote (Canis latrans) activity patterns estimated using radio-tracking locations between 1983 and 1988 with those documented between 1996 and 1997 on the Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site, in southeastern Colorado. We tested the hypothesis that changes in the type of disturbance experienced by coyotes would result in changes in their activity patterns. Disturbance experienced by the coyote population studied during 1983-1988, included >50 years of intense exploitation (shooting and trapping by ranchers) and intensive removal efforts using aerial gunning. In contrast, coyotes tracked during 1996-1997 experienced some periodic disturbance from army maneuvers occurring in the area, but were not exposed to any direct form of persecution (e.g., shooting). From August 1983 to July 1988, 49 coyotes (26 males and 23 females) were tracked for >2400 h using radiotelemetry. From April 1996 to August 1997, 22 coyotes (12 males and 10 females) were tracked for >950 h. The average rate of diurnal movement of the coyotes in the 1996-1997 field study (mean = 0.97 km/h) was significantly higher than that of the coyotes in the 1983-1988 field study (mean = 0.68 km/h). This occurred despite no significant increase in the overall (24 h) rate of movement between the two field studies. Estimates of prey use by the coyotes in both field studies were obtained, to test an alternate hypothesis that prey switching might explain the changes in coyote movement patterns. However, there was no significant difference between the frequency of occurrence of diurnally versus nocturnally active mammalian prey species in the diets of coyotes in any season or overall between the 1983-1988 and 1996-1997 field studies. This study demonstrated that coyote activity patterns can be influenced by the type of disturbance experienced by the animal. A coyote population that had historically been exposed to human persecution shifted to higher levels of diurnal activity when exploitation ceased.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/z00-003

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Across North America, coyotes are often persecuted, trapped, and removed even when no actual conflict is occurring.

    “Across North America, coyotes are often persecuted, trapped, and removed even when no actual conflict is occurring (Arthur, 1981;Kellert, 1985;Kitchen et al., 2000;Breck et al., 2019).”

    From Of Rarity and Symbolism: Understanding Human Perceptions of Charismatic Color Morphs (2024) · cites this paper as Kitchen et al., 2000

    The Methods section (page unavailable) documents decades of trapping and shooting and later aerial removal of coyotes at one Colorado site. It does not establish that these practices are common across North America or that removal occurred when no actual conflict was occurring. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Mech, L.D. 1970. The wolf: the ecology and behavior of an endan- gered species. Doubleday/Natural History Press, Garden City, N.Y. Mech, L.D. 1983. Handbook of animal radiotracking. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
  2. Vila, C., Urios, V., and Castroviejo, J. 1992. Observations on the daily activity patterns in the Iberian wolf. In Ecology and con- servation of wolves in a changing world. Edited by L.N. Carbyn, S.H. Fritts, and D.R. Seip. Canadian Circumpolar Institute, Uni- versity of Alberta, Edmonton. pp. 335-340.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kitchen, A. M., Gese, E. M., & Schauster, E. R.
Affiliations
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Zoology
Published
2000-05-01
Volume
78
Issue
5
Pages
853-857
ISSN
  • 0008-4301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1480-3283
OpenAlex
W2089021270
Cited by
212
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • Utah State University
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
  • Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
  • National Wildlife Research Center
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
coyote, activity patterns, diurnal activity, human persecution, hunting and trapping, disturbance, movement frequency, prey use, prey switching, radio telemetry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review