CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 57Physiological and biochemical adaptationsAnimal Behavior and ReproductionCrustacean biology and ecology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Metabolism and life-history correlates in a lowland and highland population of a terrestrial isopod

Open access
Lardies, Marco A, Catalán, Tamara P, Bozinovic, Francisco·2004·Canadian Journal of Zoology
DOI 10.1139/z04-033
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Ectotherms distributed along environmental gradients often show marked variation in physiological and life-history traits. Different life-history phenotypes may be correlated with variations in maintenance metabolism. We measured life-history traits and metabolic rate (VO 2) of the common wood louse (Porcellio laevis Latreille, 1804) from a lowland population and a highland population in northern Chile. We measured VO 2 at 5, 12, 18, and 25 °C. Wood lice from different altitudes exhibited large variations in life-history traits, which were correlated with changes in VO 2. Fecundity of wood lice decreased and egg volume, offspring size, and reproductive output of females increased in highland populations compared with lowland populations. Isopods from the highland had a higher VO 2 than those from lowland habitats for almost all temperatures. However, when we considered VO 2 at 5 °C, VO 2 was lowest in the high-altitude isopods. In addition, since the highest thermal sensitivity values in the VO 2–temperature curves were found at the lowest and highest temperature ranges for the highland population rather than for the lowland population, our study did not support the metabolic cold-adaptation hypothesis. We concluded that differences in VO 2 between the populations contributed to the difference in reproductive output by wood lice from cold and warm habitats.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/z04-033

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 81 · Cited by 57

Research works printed but not linked: 67

  1. Addo-Bediako A., 2002, Funct. Ecol., 16, 332, 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00634.x · DOI
  2. Anderson J.F., 1989, Drosophila. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol., 94, 269, 10.1016/0300-9629(89)90547-1 · DOI
  3. Angilletta M.J., 2001, Physiol. Biochem. Zool., 74, 11, 10.1086/319312 · DOI
  4. Annala J.H., 1980, N.Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res., 14, 217, 10.1080/00288330.1980.9515864 · DOI
  5. Ashby P.D., 1997, Physiol. Zool., 70, 701, 10.1086/515877 · DOI
  6. Atkinson D., 1997, Trends Ecol. Evol., 12, 235, 10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01058-6 · DOI
  7. Bauer R.T., 1992, Invertebr. Reprod. Dev., 22, 193, 10.1080/07924259.1992.9672272 · DOI
  8. Baur B., 1988, J. Anim. Ecol., 57, 71, 10.2307/4764 · DOI
  9. Blanckenhorn W.U., 1997, Oecologia (Berl.), 109, 342, 10.1007/s004420050092 · DOI
  10. Bernardo J., 2002, Oikos, 97, 398, 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.970310.x · DOI
  11. Berrigan D., 1997, Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol., 118, 1301, 10.1016/S0300-9629(97)00030-3 · DOI
  12. Berven K.A., 1982, Evolution, 36, 962
  13. Bouchon D., 1992, Invertebr. Reprod. Dev., 22, 203, 10.1080/07924259.1992.9672273 · DOI
  14. Chappell M.A., 1983, Oecologia (Berl.), 56, 126, 10.1007/BF00378228 · DOI
  15. Chappell M.A., 2000, J. Exp. Biol., 203, 3809, 10.1242/jeb.203.24.3809 · DOI
  16. Chown S.L., 1999, Biol. Rev. (Camb.), 74, 87, 10.1017/S000632319800526X · DOI
  17. Chown S.L., 1997, Physiol. Zool., 70, 116, 10.1086/639554 · DOI
  18. Clarke A., 1987, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 38, 89, 10.3354/meps038089 · DOI
  19. Clarke A., 1991, Am. Zool., 31, 81, 10.1093/icb/31.1.81 · DOI
  20. Clarke A., 1993, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 168, 189, 10.1016/0022-0981(93)90259-Q · DOI
  21. Clarke A., 1993, Funct. Ecol., 7, 139, 10.2307/2389880 · DOI
  22. Clarke A., 1992, Polar Biol., 12, 129, 10.1007/BF00239973 · DOI
  23. Clarke A., 1991, Funct. Ecol., 5, 724, 10.2307/2389534 · DOI
  24. David J.F., 2001, Oecologia (Berl.), 127, 343, 10.1007/s004420000599 · DOI
  25. Dingle H., 1990, Oecologia (Berl.), 84, 199, 10.1007/BF00318272 · DOI
  26. Fox C.W., 2000, Rev. Entomol., 45, 341, 10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.341 · DOI
  27. France R.L., 1992, Crustaceana (Leiden), 62, 241, 10.1163/156854092X00145 · DOI
  28. Giangrande A., 1994, Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev., 32, 305
  29. Gotthard K., 2000, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 267, 589, 10.1098/rspb.2000.1042 · DOI
  30. Hadley N.F., 1985, Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol., 80, 307, 10.1016/0300-9629(85)90042-8 · DOI
  31. Hancock M.A., 1998, Oecologia (Berl.), 115, 483, 10.1007/s004420050545 · DOI
  32. Harrison K.E., 1990, J. Shellfish Res., 9, 1
  33. Hayes J.P., 1992, Funct. Ecol., 6, 5, 10.2307/2389765 · DOI
  34. Hines A.H., 1992, Am. Zool., 32, 503, 10.1093/icb/32.3.503 · DOI
  35. Hodkinson I.D., 2003, Funct. Ecol., 17, 562, 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2003.07431.x · DOI
  36. Hornung E., 1993, Invertebr. Reprod. Dev., 23, 151, 10.1080/07924259.1993.9672306 · DOI
  37. Joos B., 1997, Physiol. Zool., 70, 167, 10.1086/639570 · DOI
  38. Kautz G., 2000, Pedobiologia, 44, 75, 10.1078/S0031-4056(04)70029-3 · DOI
  39. Lardies M.A., 2001, Mar. Biol. (Berl.), 139, 1125, 10.1007/s002270100661 · DOI
  40. Lardies M.A., 2001, Ophelia, 55, 55, 10.1080/00785236.2001.10409473 · DOI
  41. Lawlor L.R., 1976, Evolution, 30, 775, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1976.tb00958.x · DOI
  42. Lee R.E., 1982, J. Insect Physiol., 28, 725, 10.1016/0022-1910(82)90131-7 · DOI
  43. Lee R.E., 1982, Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol., 72, 167, 10.1016/0300-9629(82)90027-5 · DOI
  44. Leistikow A., 1999, Rev. Bras. Zool., 16, 1, 10.1590/S0101-81751999000100001 · DOI
  45. Lonsdale D.J., 1985, Biol. Bull. (Woods Hole), 168, 419, 10.2307/1541522 · DOI
  46. MacKay W.P., 1982, Physiol. Zool., 55, 367, 10.1086/physzool.55.4.30155864 · DOI
  47. Marquet P.A., 1998, Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat., 71, 593
  48. Marshall D.J., 1995, Polar Biol., 15, 41
  49. Massion D.D., 1983, Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol., 74, 101, 10.1016/0300-9629(83)90719-3 · DOI
  50. Mocquard J.P., 1989, Monit. Zool. Ital. Monogr., 4, 455
  51. Nelson K., 1988, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 45, 805, 10.1139/f88-098 · DOI
  52. Nelson K., 1988, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 45, 822, 10.1139/f88-099 · DOI
  53. Nielsen M.G., 1986, J. Insect Physiol., 32, 125, 10.1016/0022-1910(86)90131-9 · DOI
  54. Niewiarowski P.H., 2001, Am. Nat., 157, 421, 10.1086/319321 · DOI
  55. Nylund L., 1991, Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol., 100, 853, 10.1016/0300-9629(91)90303-T · DOI
  56. Ricklefs R.E., 2002, Trends Ecol. Evol., 17, 462, 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02578-8 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Robinson S.J.W., 2001, J. Evol. Biol., 14, 14, 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00259.x · DOI
  58. Steffensen J.F., 2002, Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol., 132, 789, 10.1016/S1095-6433(02)00048-X · DOI
  59. Thorson G., 1950, Biol. Rev. (Camb.), 25, 1, 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1950.tb00585.x · DOI
  60. Via S., 1985, Evolution, 39, 502
  61. Vleck D., 1987, J. Appl. Physiol., 62, 2103, 10.1152/jappl.1987.62.5.2103 · DOI
  62. Warburg M.R., 1987, Adv. Ecol. Res., 17, 187, 10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60246-9 · DOI
  63. Wehrtmann I.S., 1998, J. Crustac. Biol., 18, 413, 10.2307/1549406 · DOI
  64. Wehrtmann I.S., 1999, South America. Sci. Mar., 63, 325
  65. Weiner J., 1992, Trends Ecol. Evol., 7, 384, 10.1016/0169-5347(92)90009-Z · DOI
  66. Wikelski M., 2003, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 270, 2383, 10.1098/rspb.2003.2500 · DOI
  67. Wilhelm F.M., 2000, Funct. Ecol., 14, 413, 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2000.00426.x · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Lardies, M. A., Catalán, T. P., & Bozinovic, F.
ORCID
Lardies, Marco A
Venue
Canadian Journal of Zoology
Publisher
Canadian Science Publishing
Published
2004-05-01
Volume
82
Issue
5
Pages
677-687
ISSN
  • 0008-4301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1480-3283
DOI
10.1139/z04-033
OpenAlex
W2148714255
Cited by
57
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Crustacean biology and ecology
Keywords
Porcellio laevis, terrestrial isopods, maintenance metabolism, oxygen consumption, life-history traits, fecundity, egg volume, offspring size, reproductive output, elevation gradient, highland populations, lowland populations, thermal sensitivity, ectotherm physiology, northern Chile

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review