Sex and species differences in plasma oxytocin using an enzyme immunoassay
Abstract
The neuropeptide hormone oxytocin (OT) is released peripherally and centrally and has been implicated in both physiology and behavior, especially sociosexual behaviors. Knowledge of OT levels in blood or other sources would be useful but these are rarely reported. Radioimmunoassay following extraction is the most commonly used method for measuring OT but is not ideal for use in small mammals in which blood volumes and concentrations of OT are low. Here we report a chemical and biological validation for a commercially available enzyme immunoassay for OT in unextracted plasma. In addition, comparisons of OT were made across species to allow comparison of the monogamous prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster (Wagner, 1842)) to the polygynous Sprague Dawley rat. These species were chosen because OT plays a role in the formation of social bonds and we predicted that the highly social prairie vole would have higher plasma OT than the less social rat. Results of this comparison confirmed our hypothesis. Further, OT was significantly higher in females than in males in both species. Our results indicate that this enzyme immunoassay can be used to assay plasma OT in rodents and that the predicted correlations exist between plasma OT and gender as well as species-typical social behavior.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sex differences in the OXTR system are documented, suggesting findings in males may not generalize to females.
“Sex differences in the OXTR system are documented,11, 12, 13 suggesting that findings in males may not generalize to females.”
From Intranasal oxytocin enhances intrinsic corticostriatal functional connectivity in women (2017) · cites this paper as [12]
Previous research on rodents found that sexually-naïve females had increased oxytocin levels compared to sexually-naïve males.
“In contrast to previous research on rodents (polygynous rats and monogamous prairie voles) where sexually-naïve females had increased levels of oxytocin compared to sexually-naïve males (Kramer et al., 2004) we found no sex differences in oxytocin levels.”
From Variation in oxytocin is related to variation in affiliative behavior in monogamous, pairbonded tamarins (2010) · cites this paper as Kramer et al., 2004
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 99
- Authors
- Kramer, K. M., Cushing, B. S., Carter, C. S., Wu, J., & Ottinger, M. A.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Zoology
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 2004-08-01
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1194-1200
- ISSN
- 0008-4301 (ISSN-L)
- 1480-3283
- OpenAlex
- W2034232120
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Keywords
- oxytocin, plasma oxytocin, enzyme immunoassay validation, sex differences, species differences, Microtus ochrogaster, Sprague-Dawley rats, monogamy, polygyny, social bonding, sociosexual behavior, neuropeptides
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review