Embryogenesis and larval differentiation in sponges
Open accessAbstract
Having descended from the first multicellular animals on earth, sponges are a key group in which to seek innovations that form the basis of the metazoan body plan, but sponges themselves have a body plan that is extremely difficult to reconcile with that of other animals. Adult sponges lack overt anterior–posterior polarity and sensory organs, and whether they possess true tissues is even debated. Nevertheless, sexual reproduction occurs as in other metazoans, with the development of embryos through a structured series of cellular divisions and organized rearrangements of cellular material, using both mesenchymal and epithelial movements to form a multicellular embryo. In most cases, the embryo undergoes morphogenesis into a spatially organized larva that has several cell layers, anterior–posterior polarity, and sensory capabilities. Here we review original data on the mode of cleavage, timing of cellular differentiation, and the mechanisms involved in the organization of differentiated cells to form the highly structured sponge larva. Our ultimate goal is to develop interpretations of the phylogenetic importance of these data within the Porifera and among basal Metazoa.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Due to the plasticity and diversity of the sponge body plan and modes of embryonic development, it is very difficult to draw comparisons between the digestive system and cell types of sponges and of cnidarians or bilaterians.
“Due to the plasticity and diversity of the sponge body plan and modes of embryonic development (Ereskovsky 2010; Leys and Ereskovsky 2006), it is very difficult to draw comparisons between the digestive system and cell types of sponges and of cnidarians or bilaterians.”
From A non-bilaterian perspective on the development and evolution of animal digestive systems (2019) · cites this paper as Leys and Ereskovsky 2006
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 117 · Cited by 100
- Authors
- Leys, S. P., & Ereskovsky, A. V.
- Affiliations
- St. Petersburg Department of Steklov Institute of Mathematics (RU)
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Zoology
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 2006-02-01
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 262-287
- ISSN
- 0008-4301 (ISSN-L)
- 1480-3283
- OpenAlex
- W1979386184
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 117
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 7.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hal.science
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
- HAL AMU (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- Russian Foundation for Basic Research
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Marine Sponges and Natural Products
- Keywords
- sponges, cell cleavage, cell differentiation, larval morphogenesis, anterior-posterior polarity, phylogenetic significance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review