Cited by 100Marine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationMarine Sponges and Natural Products

Embryogenesis and larval differentiation in sponges

Open access
Leys, S P, Ereskovsky, A V·2006·Canadian Journal of Zoology

Abstract

Having descended from the first multicellular animals on earth, sponges are a key group in which to seek innovations that form the basis of the metazoan body plan, but sponges themselves have a body plan that is extremely difficult to reconcile with that of other animals. Adult sponges lack overt anterior–posterior polarity and sensory organs, and whether they possess true tissues is even debated. Nevertheless, sexual reproduction occurs as in other metazoans, with the development of embryos through a structured series of cellular divisions and organized rearrangements of cellular material, using both mesenchymal and epithelial movements to form a multicellular embryo. In most cases, the embryo undergoes morphogenesis into a spatially organized larva that has several cell layers, anterior–posterior polarity, and sensory capabilities. Here we review original data on the mode of cleavage, timing of cellular differentiation, and the mechanisms involved in the organization of differentiated cells to form the highly structured sponge larva. Our ultimate goal is to develop interpretations of the phylogenetic importance of these data within the Porifera and among basal Metazoa.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/z05-170

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Due to the plasticity and diversity of the sponge body plan and modes of embryonic development, it is very difficult to draw comparisons between the digestive system and cell types of sponges and of cnidarians or bilaterians.

    “Due to the plasticity and diversity of the sponge body plan and modes of embryonic development (Ereskovsky 2010; Leys and Ereskovsky 2006), it is very difficult to draw comparisons between the digestive system and cell types of sponges and of cnidarians or bilaterians.”

    From A non-bilaterian perspective on the development and evolution of animal digestive systems (2019) · cites this paper as Leys and Ereskovsky 2006

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 117 · Cited by 100

Authors
Leys, S. P., & Ereskovsky, A. V.
Affiliations
St. Petersburg Department of Steklov Institute of Mathematics (RU)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Zoology
Published
2006-02-01
Volume
84
Issue
2
Pages
262-287
ISSN
  • 0008-4301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1480-3283
OpenAlex
W1979386184
Cited by
100
References
117
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 11
FWCI
7.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
  • HAL AMU (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Russian Foundation for Basic Research
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Marine Sponges and Natural Products
Keywords
sponges, cell cleavage, cell differentiation, larval morphogenesis, anterior-posterior polarity, phylogenetic significance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review