The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The chemical ecology and evolution of bee–flower interactions: a review and perspectivesThe present review is one in the special series of reviews on animal–plant interactions.
Abstract
Bees and angiosperms have shared a long and intertwined evolutionary history and their interactions have resulted in remarkable adaptations. Yet, at a time when the “pollination crisis” is of major concern as natural populations of both wild and honey bees ( Apis mellifera L., 1758) face alarming decline rates at a worldwide scale, there are important gaps in our understanding of the ecology and evolution of bee–flower interactions. In this review, we summarize and discuss the current knowledge about the role of floral chemistry versus other communication channels in bee-pollinated flowering plants, both at the macro- and micro-evolutionary levels, and across the specialization–generalization gradient. The available data illustrate that floral scents and floral chemistry have been largely overlooked in bee–flower interactions, and that pollination studies integrating these components along with pollinator behaviour in a phylogenetic context will help gain considerable insights into the sensory ecology and the evolution of bees and their associated flowering plants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation
Schluter, D. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198505235.001.0001 · Cited by 4,974
Decline and conservation of bumble bees
Goulson, D., Lye, G. C., & Darvill, B. (2008) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093454 · Cited by 1,183 · cited 2×
“2005), (ii) rising worries about mass declines of their natural populations (Steffan-Dewenter et al. 2005; Williams 2005; Biesmeijer et al. 2006; Fitzpatrick et al. 2007; Colla and Packer 2008; Goulson et al. 2008), and (iii) colony collapse disorder (CCD) of Apis mellifera L.”
BackgroundSPECIALIZED BEES FAIL TO DEVELOP ON NON-HOST POLLEN: DO PLANTS CHEMICALLY PROTECT THEIR POLLEN
Praz, C. J., Müller, A., & Dorn, S. (2008) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/07-0751.1 · Cited by 224
Cited by
Agathokleous, E., Feng, Z., Oksanen, E., Sicard, P., Wang, Q., Saitanis, C. J., Araminiene, V., Blande, J. D., Hayes, F., Calatayud, V., et al. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abc1176 · Cited by 382
Global warming and plant–pollinator mismatches
Gérard, M., Vanderplanck, M., Wood, T., & Michez, D. (2020) · Emerging Topics in Life Sciences · doi:10.1042/etls20190139 · Cited by 303
Multisensory integration of colors and scents: insights from bees and flowers
Leonard, A. S., & Masek, P. (2014) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/s00359-014-0904-4 · Cited by 161
Floral Reward, Advertisement and Attractiveness to Honey Bees in Dioecious Salix caprea
Dötterl, S., Glück, U., Jürgens, A., Woodring, J., & Aas, G. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093421 · Cited by 86
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dötterl, S., & Vereecken, N. J.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Zoology
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 668-697
- ISSN
- 0008-4301 (ISSN-L)
- 1480-3283
- OpenAlex
- W1550003990
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The chemical ecology and evolution of bee–flower interactions: a review and perspectivesThe present review is one in the special series of reviews on animal–plant interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/z10-031
- The paper
- Dötterl, S., & Vereecken, N. J. (2010). The chemical ecology and evolution of bee–flower interactions: a review and perspectivesThe present review is one in the special series of reviews on animal–plant interactions. Canadian Journal of Zoology. https://doi.org/10.1139/z10-031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.