The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ecology and evolution of sympatric sticklebacks (Gasterosteus): specialization for alternative trophic niches in the Enos Lake species pair
Abstract
Two morphologically distinct species of threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus) coexist in Enos Lake on Vancouver Island. For convenience these species are referred to as "limnetics" and "benthics." We used three experiments to compare the feeding performance of the two species and to test the hypothesis that limnetics are adapted for planktivory whereas benthics are adapted to forage on substrates. The results support this conclusion. When tested for maximum prey size; benthics consumed larger prey (relative to their body size) than limnetics. Benthics also were more successful than limnetics in foraging on a substrate. When allowed to forage for a fixed time on a detritus substrate, benthics of both sexes captured more prey than male limnetics, even though male limnetics directed as many feeding strikes at the substrate as did the benthics. Female limnetics would not forage on a detritus substrate. Limnetics were more successful in feeding on plankton than benthics. When held in mesh enclosures suspended in Enos Lake, limnetics consumed more plankton than benthics. Small limnetics (26–36 mm standard length) consumed nearly four times more plankton than large limnetics (44–50 mm standard length). The small limnetics were all either mature females or immature males; the large limnetics were all mature males. The results of the benthic foraging and plankton feeding comparisons support the additional conclusion that Enos Lake limnetics are sexually dimorphic in their feeding behaviour.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The genetic architecture of divergence between threespine stickleback species.
Peichel, C. L., Nereng, K. S., Ohgi, K. A., Cole, B. L. E., Colosimo, P. F., Buerkle, C. A., Schluter, D., & Kingsley, D. M. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/414901a · Cited by 521
WALKER, J. (1997) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1006/bijl.1996.9999 · Cited by 401
A COMPARISON OF TWO STICKLEBACKS
Day, T., Pritchard, J., & Schluter, D. (1994) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb02208.x · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Bentzen, P., & McPhail, J. D.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Zoology
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1984-11-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2280-2286
- ISSN
- 0008-4301 (ISSN-L)
- 1480-3283
- OpenAlex
- W2139415671
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecology and evolution of sympatric sticklebacks (Gasterosteus): specialization for alternative trophic niches in the Enos Lake species pair. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/z84-331
- The paper
- Bentzen, P., & McPhail, J. D. (1984). Ecology and evolution of sympatric sticklebacks (Gasterosteus): specialization for alternative trophic niches in the Enos Lake species pair. Canadian Journal of Zoology. https://doi.org/10.1139/z84-331
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.