The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dynamics of caribou and wolves in northern British Columbia
Abstract
Major fluctuations in caribou (Rangifer tarandus) numbers have occurred since the settlement of European man in British Columbia. Caribou declined in the late 1930's and 1940's after moose (Alces alces) expanded their range and wolves (Canis lupus) increased. Following a wolf reduction program from 1949 to 1962, the caribou expanded until a high was reached in the late 1960's, after which the herds again diminished as wolf numbers increased and calf recruitment decreased. Three caribou populations were censused between 1976 and 1982, and an experiment was conducted on one of these areas (with the others as controls) to test the effect of wolf numbers on herd growth. The Spatsizi–Lawyers and Level–Kawdy populations inhabited ranges where wolf densities were near 9–10wolves/1000 km 2;Spatsizi–Lawyers declined between 1977 and 1982(r = −0.13) and Level–Kawdy declined between 1977 and 1982(r = −0.12). We reduced wolves at the experimental Horseranch population from 10 to 1–4/1000 km 2 and these caibou increased from 1977 to 1982 at an average exponential rate of 6% per year. None of the populations were heavily hunted; however, both declining populations had low calf survival with a mean of 55% of the calves dying within the first 2 weeks of life. Calf survival increased significantly at the Horseranch in the 3 years that wolves were reduced. In conclusion, we believe that the Spatsizi–Lawyers and Level–Kawdy populations declined as a result of predation on calves and adults. Yet, if wolves are managed to provide stabilizing recruitments for caribou, it should be possible to dampen the natural fluctuations of caribou and wolves that are frequent in unperturbed systems and maintain higher numbers of both species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ungulate Population Models with Predation: A Case Study with the North American Moose
Messier, F. (1994) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1939551 · Cited by 552
Global declines of caribou and reindeer
VORS, L. S., & BOYCE, M. S. (2009) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01974.x · Cited by 504
Wolves, Moose, and Tree Rings on Isle Royale
McLaren, B. E., & Peterson, R. O. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.266.5190.1555 · Cited by 458
Long‐Term Range Recession and the Persistence of Caribou in the Taiga
Schaefer, J. A. (2003) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02288.x · Cited by 184
Winter distribution of woodland caribou in relation to clear-cut logging in west-central Alberta
Smith, K. G., Ficht, E. J., Hobson, D., Sorensen, T. C., & Hervieux, D. (2000) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z00-094 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- Bergerud, A. T., & Elliot, J. P.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Zoology
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1986-07-01
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1515-1529
- ISSN
- 0008-4301 (ISSN-L)
- 1480-3283
- OpenAlex
- W2108182653
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamics of caribou and wolves in northern British Columbia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/z86-226
- The paper
- Bergerud, A. T., & Elliot, J. P. (1986). Dynamics of caribou and wolves in northern British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Zoology. https://doi.org/10.1139/z86-226
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.