The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Animal decision making and its ecological consequences: the future of aquatic ecology and behaviour
Abstract
It is virtually impossible to predict the next 25 years of research in aquatic ecology and behaviour with any accuracy. However, by identifying those areas that are the current frontiers of the discipline it is possible to guess at the most likely research developments over the next decade. From my own biased perspective, the research programme most likely to be productive in the near future is that of behavioural ecology, which studies, among other things, animal decision making in an ecological context. I focus on situations in which animals must make decisions under conflicting objectives, e.g., to simultaneously maximize net energy intake while minimizing risk of predation. New data on guppies (Poecilia reticulata) are presented and the recent literature is reviewed to support the notion that animals in such situations behave so as to maximize fitness. Habitat choices, ontogenetic habitat shifts, and the phenomena of vertical migration and downstream drift are beginning to be considered in this general evolutionary framework, with novel results, and this trend will undoubtedly continue. Extension of the logic of trade-offs to the community level leads to a number of new insights about the processes that shape community structure, and affirms the need for aquatic ecologists of the future to have a thorough understanding of animal behaviour, and a working knowledge of such tools of evolutionary ecology as optimality reasoning and game theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus
Lima, S. L., & Dill, L. M. (1990) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z90-092 · Cited by 8,196
Self-citationMeta-analysis of foraging and predation risk trade-offs in terrestrial systems
Verdolin, J. L. (2006) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-006-0172-6 · Cited by 490
Turner, A. M., & Mittelbach, G. G. (1990) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1938636 · Cited by 352
Sublethal consequences of stream-dwelling predatory stoneflies on mayfly growth and fecundity
Peckarsky, B. L., Cowan, C. A., Penton, M. A., & Anderson, C. (1993) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1939941 · Cited by 280
McIntosh, A. R., & Townsend, C. R. (1996) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00333229 · Cited by 240
Metadata
- Authors
- Dill, L. M.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Zoology
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1987-04-01
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 803-811
- ISSN
- 0008-4301 (ISSN-L)
- 1480-3283
- OpenAlex
- W2103341633
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Animal decision making and its ecological consequences: the future of aquatic ecology and behaviour. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/z87-128
- The paper
- Dill, L. M. (1987). Animal decision making and its ecological consequences: the future of aquatic ecology and behaviour. Canadian Journal of Zoology. https://doi.org/10.1139/z87-128
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.