Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,695

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analyses

Seutin, Gilles, White, Bradley N., Boag, Peter T.·1991·Canadian Journal of Zoology

Abstract

A problem frequently faced by researchers involved in collecting tissues for DNA isolation is the preservation of samples in the field prior to and during their transportation to the laboratory. Prevention of DNA degradation is usually achieved through freezing. As this is not always practical, we have tested the efficiency of chemical solutions containing high concentrations of salts (e.g., NaCl, EDTA, and diaminocyclohexanetetraacetate) and detergent at preserving DNA in bird tissue and blood samples stored at ambient temperature for extended periods of time. For blood samples, we recommend the use of a buffer that lyses the cells and nuclei and contains 0.01 M Tris, 0.01 M NaCl, 0.01 M EDTA, and 1% n-lauroylsarcosine, Ph 7.5. Tissue samples are best preserved as small pieces in a saline solution made of 20% dimethyl sulfoxyde, 0.25 M EDTA, saturated with NaCl, pH 8.0. DNA extracted from samples preserved in these solutions for up to 24 weeks was compared with DNA recovered from tissue samples stored at −70 °C and blood samples stored at −70 and −20 °C. Yields were similar, averaging 300 μg/0.2 g of tissue and 500 μg/50 μL of blood. Quality of DNA in terms of fragment size, ability to be cut by restriction enzymes, and ability to hybridize to radioactive probes was also similar between cryopreserved and chemically preserved samples. Yields of DNA recovered from tissue samples preserved in 70% ethanol for 6 or 11 weeks was very low and significant degradation was observed. We have also examined how DNA contained in crude avian blood samples withstands freeze–thaw cycles. We found normal yields and no significant degradation of DNA in samples that experienced up to six cycles. We encourage field researchers who refrain from preserving tissue samples because of logistical problems, such as transporting liquid nitrogen containers in the field, to consider using these solutions. Both solutions can also facilitate exchanges of samples between laboratories, and they form an alternative to storage of samples at −70 °C for laboratories and museums with limited access to deep-freezing facilities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/z91-013

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,695

Metadata

Authors
Seutin, G., White, B. N., & Boag, P. T.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Zoology
Published
1991-01-01
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
82-90
ISSN
  • 0008-4301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1480-3283
OpenAlex
W1992234981
Cited by
1,695
References
0
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analyses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/z91-013
The paper
Seutin, G., White, B. N., & Boag, P. T. (1991). Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analyses. Canadian Journal of Zoology. https://doi.org/10.1139/z91-013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.