Cited by 10Quantum and Classical ElectrodynamicsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesRelativity and Gravitational Theory

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Polarization of spin-1 particles in a uniform magnetic field

Open access
Silenko, Alexander J.·2008·The European Physical Journal C

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1140/epjc/s10052-008-0701-8

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Foldy-Wouthuysen Hamiltonian for the photon is defined by Eq. (40).

    “As a result of derivations [68], the FW Hamiltonian is defined by”

    From Zitterbewegung of massless particles (2022) · cites this paper as [68]

    The passage labeled Abstract (p. 4) gives an exact FW Hamiltonian as Eq. (5) for spin-1 particles in a uniform magnetic field. It does not identify that Hamiltonian as a photon Hamiltonian or as Eq. (40), so those parts of the attribution are unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation of the Dirac-like equation for the free electromagnetic field was carried out only in 2014 by Barnett.

    “The FW transformation of Eq. (36) has been carried out only in 2014 by Barnett [68].”

    From Zitterbewegung of massless particles (2022) · cites this paper as [68]

    The discussion of the FW Hamiltonian (p. 4) concerns spin-1 particles interacting with a uniform magnetic field, not a Dirac-like equation for the free electromagnetic field. Searches for Barnett, 2014, and the free electromagnetic field found no passage addressing when that equation was transformed. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. A.A. Sokolov, I.M. Ternov, Radiation from Relativistic Electrons (Am. Inst. Phys., New York, 1986)
  2. V.N. Baier, V.M. Katkov, V.S. Fadin, Radiation from Relativistic Electrons (Atomizdat, Moscow, 1973) (in Russian)
  3. A.J. Silenko, Czech. J. Phys. 51, 219–222 (2001) · DOI
  4. H.C. Corben, J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 58, 953–968 (1940) · DOI
  5. L.L. Foldy, S.A. Wouthuysen, Phys. Rev. 78, 29–36 (1950) · DOI · Paper page
  6. S. Weinberg, in Lectures on Elementary Particles and Quantum Field Theory, ed. by S. Deser, M. Grisaru, H. Pendleton (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1970)
  7. I.B. Khriplovich, Z. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 96, 385–390 (1989). Sov. Phys. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 69, 217–219 (1989)
  8. S. Ferrara, M. Porrati, V.L. Telegdi, Phys. Rev. D 46, 3529–3537 (1992) · DOI
  9. A. Proca, C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 202, 1490–1492 (1936)
  10. M. Taketani, S. Sakata, Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Jpn. 22, 757–770 (1940)
  11. M. Taketani, S. Sakata, Progr. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 1, 84–97 (1955) · DOI
  12. J.A. Young, S.A. Bludman, Phys. Rev. 131, 2326–2334 (1963) · DOI
  13. J.P. Costella, B.H.J. McKellar, Am. J. Phys. 63, 1119–1121 (1995) · DOI
  14. A.J. Silenko, J. Math. Phys. 44, 2952–2966 (2003) · DOI
  15. A.J. Silenko, Phys. Rev. A 77, 012116 (2008) · DOI
  16. K.M. Case, Phys. Rev. 95, 1323–1328 (1954) · DOI
  17. A.J. Silenko, Z. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 114, 1153–1161 (1998). J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 87, 629–633 (1998)
  18. A.J. Silenko, Z. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 114, 448–457 (1998). J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 87, 246–250 (1998)
  19. A.J. Silenko, Z. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 123, 883–890 (2003). J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 96, 775–781 (1998)
  20. A.J. Silenko, arXiv:hep-th/0404074 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Silenko, A. J.
Affiliations
Belarusian State University (BY)
Corresponding author
Silenko, Alexander J.
Venue
The European Physical Journal C
Published
2008-08-26
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
595-599
ISSN
  • 1434-6044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1434-6052
OpenAlex
W2084717383
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The European Physical Journal C (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • BSU Digital Library (Belarusian State University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Belarusian Republican Foundation for Fundamental Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
spin-1 particles, polarization, uniform magnetic field, Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation, anomalous magnetic moment, high magnetic fields, spin dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review