The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Updated status of the global electroweak fit and constraints on new physics
Open accessAbstract
We present an update of the Standard Model fit to electroweak precision data. We include newest experimental results on the top-quark mass, the W mass and width, and the Higgs-boson mass bounds from LEP, Tevatron and the LHC. We also include a new determination of the electromagnetic coupling strength at the Z pole. We find for the Higgs-boson mass $91^{+30}_{-23}~\mbox{GeV}$ and $120^{+12}_{-5}~\mbox{GeV}$ when not including and including the direct Higgs searches, respectively. From the latter fit we indirectly determine the W mass to be $(80.360^{+0.014}_{-0.013})~\mbox{GeV}$. We exploit the data to determine experimental constraints on the oblique vacuum polarisation parameters, and confront these with predictions from the Standard Model (SM) and selected SM extensions. By fitting the oblique parameters to the electroweak data we derive allowed regions in the BSM parameter spaces. We revisit and consistently update these constraints for a fourth fermion generation, two Higgs doublet, inert Higgs and littlest Higgs models, models with large, universal or warped extra dimensions and technicolour. In most of the models studied a heavy Higgs boson can be made compatible with the electroweak precision data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension
Randall, L., & Sundrum, R. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.3370 · Cited by 9,227
The hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter
Arkani–Hamed, N., Dimopoulos, S., & Dvali, G. (1998) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(98)00466-3 · Cited by 6,563
Cited by
Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models
Branco, G. C., Ferreira, P. M., Lavoura, L., Rebelo, M. N., Sher, M., & Silva, J. P. (2012) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.02.002 · Cited by 2,627
Metadata
- Authors
- The Gfitter Group, Baak, M., Goebel, M., Haller, J., Hoecker, A., Kennedy, D., Mönig, K., Schott, M., & Stelzer, J.
- Venue
- The European Physical Journal C
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 1434-6044 (ISSN-L)
- 1434-6052
- OpenAlex
- W2139131545
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Updated status of the global electroweak fit and constraints on new physics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2003-4
- The paper
- The Gfitter Group, Baak, M., Goebel, M., Haller, J., Hoecker, A., Kennedy, D., Mönig, K., Schott, M., & Stelzer, J. (2012). Updated status of the global electroweak fit and constraints on new physics. The European Physical Journal C. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2003-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.