Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 763

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Review of lattice results concerning low-energy particle physics

Open access
FLAG Working Group, Aoki, S., Aoki, Y., Bernard, C., Blum, T., Colangelo, G., Della Morte, M., Dürr, S., El-Khadra, A. X., Fukaya, H., Horsley, R., Jüttner, A., Kaneko, T., Laiho, J., Lellouch, L., Leutwyler, H., Lubicz, V., Lunghi, E., Necco, S., Onogi, T., Pena, C., Sachrajda, C. T., Sharpe, S. R., Simula, S., Sommer, R., Van de Water, R. S., Vladikas, A., Wenger, U., Wittig, H.·2014·The European Physical Journal C

Abstract

We review lattice results related to pion, kaon, [Formula: see text]- and [Formula: see text]-meson physics with the aim of making them easily accessible to the particle-physics community. More specifically, we report on the determination of the light-quark masses, the form factor [Formula: see text], arising in semileptonic [Formula: see text] transition at zero momentum transfer, as well as the decay-constant ratio [Formula: see text] of decay constants and its consequences for the CKM matrix elements [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. Furthermore, we describe the results obtained on the lattice for some of the low-energy constants of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] Chiral Perturbation Theory and review the determination of the [Formula: see text] parameter of neutral kaon mixing. The inclusion of heavy-quark quantities significantly expands the FLAG scope with respect to the previous review. Therefore, we focus here on [Formula: see text]- and [Formula: see text]-meson decay constants, form factors, and mixing parameters, since these are most relevant for the determination of CKM matrix elements and the global CKM unitarity-triangle fit. In addition we review the status of lattice determinations of the strong coupling constant [Formula: see text].

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2890-7

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 763

Metadata

Authors
FLAG Working Group, Aoki, S., Aoki, Y., Bernard, C., Blum, T., Colangelo, G., Della Morte, M., Dürr, S., El-Khadra, A. X., Fukaya, H., Horsley, R., Jüttner, A., Kaneko, T., Laiho, J., Lellouch, L., Leutwyler, H., Lubicz, V., Lunghi, E., Necco, S., Onogi, T., Pena, C., Sachrajda, C. T., Sharpe, S. R., Simula, S., Sommer, R., Van de Water, R. S., Vladikas, A., Wenger, U., & Wittig, H.
Venue
The European Physical Journal C
Published
2014-09
Volume
74
Issue
9
Pages
2890-2890
ISSN
  • 1434-6044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1434-6052
OpenAlex
W2162020865
Cited by
763
References
2
FWCI
62.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review of lattice results concerning low-energy particle physics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2890-7
The paper
FLAG Working Group, Aoki, S., Aoki, Y., Bernard, C., Blum, T., Colangelo, G., Della Morte, M., Dürr, S., El-Khadra, A. X., Fukaya, H., Horsley, R., Jüttner, A., Kaneko, T., Laiho, J., Lellouch, L., Leutwyler, H., Lubicz, V., Lunghi, E., Necco, S., . . . Wittig, H. (2014). Review of lattice results concerning low-energy particle physics. The European Physical Journal C. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2890-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.