The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Updated post-WMAP benchmarks for supersymmetry
Open accessAbstract
Abstract.We update a previously-proposed set of supersymmetric benchmark scenarios, taking into account the precise constraints on the cold dark matter density obtained by combining WMAP and other cosmological data, as well as the LEP and $b \rightarrow s \gamma$ constraints. We assume that R parity is conserved and work within the constrained MSSM (CMSSM) with universal soft supersymmetry-breaking scalar and gaugino masses m0 and m1/2. In most cases, the relic density calculated for the previous benchmarks may be brought within the WMAP range by reducing slightly m0, but in two cases more substantial changes in m0 and m1/2 are made. Since the WMAP constraint reduces the effective dimensionality of the CMSSM parameter space, one may study phenomenology along “WMAP lines” in the (m1/2, m0) plane that have acceptable amounts of dark matter. We discuss the production, decays and detectability of sparticles along these lines, at the LHC and at linear e + e- colliders in the sub- and multi-TeV ranges, stressing the complementarity of hadron and lepton colliders, and with particular emphasis on the neutralino sector. Finally, we preview the accuracy with which one might be able to predict the density of supersymmetric cold dark matter using collider measurements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., Limon, M., Meyer, S. S., Page, L., Spergel, D. N., Tucker, G. S., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377253 · Cited by 4,860
Cited by
CMS Physics Technical Design Report, Volume II: Physics Performance
Collaboration, T. C. (2007) · Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics · doi:10.1088/0954-3899/34/6/s01 · Cited by 940
Physics interplay of the LHC and the ILC
Weiglein, G., Barklow, T., Boos, E., De Roeck, A., Desch, K., Gianotti, F., Godbole, R., Gunion, J. F., Haber, H. E., Heinemeyer, S., et al. (2006) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.12.003 · Cited by 405
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Battaglia, M., Roeck, A. D., Ellis, J., Gianotti, F., Olive, K. A., & Pape, L.
- Venue
- The European Physical Journal C
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 273-296
- ISSN
- 1434-6044 (ISSN-L)
- 1434-6052
- OpenAlex
- W2041589930
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Updated post-WMAP benchmarks for supersymmetry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1140/epjc/s2003-01575-7
- The paper
- Battaglia, M., Roeck, A. D., Ellis, J., Gianotti, F., Olive, K. A., & Pape, L. (2004). Updated post-WMAP benchmarks for supersymmetry. The European Physical Journal C. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s2003-01575-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.