The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE MOUSE IN BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome
Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01262 · Cited by 7,187
Male-male competition magnifies inbreeding depression in wild house mice.
Meagher, S., Penn, D. J., & Potts, W. K. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.7.3324 · Cited by 322
Linkage of Mls genes to endogenous mammary tumour viruses of inbred mice
Frankel, W. N., Rudy, C., Coffin, J. M., & Huber, B. T. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/349526a0 · Cited by 306
Ritzel, R. M., Doran, S. J., Glaser, E. P., Meadows, V. E., Faden, A. I., Stoica, B. A., & Loane, D. J. (2019) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.02.010 · Cited by 156
Moon, J. S., Goeminne, L. J. E., Kim, J. T., Tian, J. W., Kim, S., Nga, H. T., Kang, S. G., Kang, B. E., Byun, J., Lee, Y., et al. (2020) · Aging Cell · doi:10.1111/acel.13195 · Cited by 141
Metadata
- Authors
- Roberts, R. B., & Threadgill, D. W.
- Venue
- The Mouse in Animal Genetics and Breeding Research
- Published
- 2005-06
- Pages
- 319-340
- OpenAlex
- W2476079089
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.82
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE MOUSE IN BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1142/9781860947162_0015
- The paper
- Roberts, R. B., & Threadgill, D. W. (2005). THE MOUSE IN BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH. The Mouse in Animal Genetics and Breeding Research. https://doi.org/10.1142/9781860947162_0015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
