Cited by 16Biomedical Text Mining and OntologiesPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

PGxMine: Text mining for curation of PharmGKB

Open access
Lever, Jake, Barbarino, Julia M., Gong, Li, Huddart, Rachel, Sangkuhl, Katrin, Whaley, Ryan, Whirl-Carrillo, Michelle, Woon, Mark +2 more·2019·Biocomputing 2020

Abstract

Precision medicine tailors treatment to individuals personal data including differences in their genome. The Pharmacogenomics Knowledgebase (PharmGKB) provides highly curated information on the effect of genetic variation on drug response and side effects for a wide range of drugs. PharmGKB's scientific curators triage, review and annotate a large number of papers each year but the task is challenging. We present the PGxMine resource, a text-mined resource of pharmacogenomic associations from all accessible published literature to assist in the curation of PharmGKB. We developed a supervised machine learning pipeline to extract associations between a variant (DNA and protein changes, star alleles and dbSNP identifiers) and a chemical. PGxMine covers 452 chemicals and 2,426 variants and contains 19,930 mentions of pharmacogenomic associations across 7,170 papers. An evaluation by PharmGKB curators found that 57 of the top 100 associations not found in PharmGKB led to 83 curatable papers and a further 24 associations would likely lead to curatable papers through citations. The results can be viewed at https://pgxmine.pharmgkb.org/ and code can be downloaded at https://github.com/jakelever/pgxmine.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/9789811215636_0054

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Machine learning and natural language processing methods allow database curators to retrieve and curate more accurately and efficiently relevant literature than traditional keyword-based PubMed search methods.

    “showing that machine learning and natural language processing methods (15,16) allow database curators to retrieve and curate more accurately and efficiently relevant literature, than traditional keyword-based PubMed search methods.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lever, J., Barbarino, J. M., Gong, L., Huddart, R., Sangkuhl, K., Whaley, R., Whirl-Carrillo, M., Woon, M., Klein, T. E., & Altman, R. B.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Venue
Biocomputing 2020
Published
2019-11-27
Volume
25
Pages
611-622
OpenAlex
W2991516389
Cited by
16
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4
FWCI
8.29
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing (PSB) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (OT2TR002515)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U01GM061374, R24GM061374)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (R01LM005652)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
pharmacogenomics, PharmGKB, text mining, genetic variation, drug response, precision medicine, literature curation, variant annotation
MeSH terms
Humans, Pharmacogenetics, Computational Biology, Databases, Genetic, Knowledge Bases, Data Mining, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review