Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Explaining the Volume of Trade: An Eclectic Approach

MARKUSEN, JAMES R.·2021·World Scientific Studies in International Economics

Abstract

Divide the world into a capital-abundant North and a labor-abundant South. Subdivide the North into two identical regions, East and West.Modern trade theory predicts intraindustry trade in differentiated manufactured goods between East and West, and traditional interindustry trade based on factor endowments between North and South. But the theory offers no conclusions about the volume of trade , and gives no real role to demand in determining trade flows. The model developed here explains both the volume and the direction of trade by combining nonhomothetic preferences with scale economies and differences in endowments. Copyright 1986 by American Economic Association.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/9789811222962_0009

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 267

Metadata

Authors
MARKUSEN, J. R.
Venue
World Scientific Studies in International Economics
Published
2021-03
Pages
177-186
ISSN
1793-3641 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1531390412
Cited by
267
References
0
FWCI
19.23
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Explaining the Volume of Trade: An Eclectic Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1142/9789811222962_0009
The paper
MARKUSEN, J. R. (2021). Explaining the Volume of Trade: An Eclectic Approach. World Scientific Studies in International Economics. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811222962_0009

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.