Cited by 201Emotion and Mood RecognitionSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

MULTIMODAL EMOTION RECOGNITION

Open access
Sebe, Nicu, Cohen, Ira, Huang, Thomas S.·2005·Handbook of Pattern Recognition and Computer Vision

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/9789812775320_0021

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Probabilistic graphical models, such as Hidden Markov Models, Bayesian networks and Dynamic Bayesian networks, are very well suited for fusing different sources of information in multimodal emotion recognition and can handle noisy features and missing values by probabilistic inference.

    “Sebe et al. [3] highlight that probabilistic graphical models, such as Hidden Markov Models, Bayesian networks and Dynamic Bayesian networks are very well suited for fusing different sources of information in multimodal emotion recognition and can also handle noisy features and missing values of features all by probabilistic inference.”

    From Multimodal emotion recognition from expressive faces, body gestures and speech (2007) · cites this paper as [3]

    The indexed copy contains an archive entry for the chapter, including PDF listings under Abstract, but no chapter-text passage addressing the claim. Searches for graphical models, probabilistic inference, noisy or missing features, and multimodal fusion returned only archive metadata, so the attributed statement cannot be verified from this copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 201

Authors
Sebe, N., Cohen, I., & Huang, T. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Hewlett-Packard (United States) (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Handbook of Pattern Recognition and Computer Vision
Published
2005-01
Pages
387-409
OpenAlex
W1552007786
Cited by
201
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
18.50
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
multimodal emotion recognition, emotion recognition, multimodal fusion, facial expressions, speech emotion recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review