The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THEORY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF NEURON SELECTIVITY: ORIENTATION SPECIFICITY AND BINOCULAR INTERACTION IN VISUAL CORTEX
Abstract
Development of stimulus selectivity in primary sensory cortex of higher vertebrates is considered in a general mathematical framework. A synaptic evolution scheme of a new kind is proposed in which incoming patterns rather than converging afferents compete. The change in efficacy of a given synapse depends not only on instantaneous pre and postsynaptic activities but also on a slowly varying time-averaged value of the postsynaptic activity. Assuming an appropriate nonlinear form for this dependence, development of selectivity is obtained under quite general conditions on the sensory environment. One does not require nonlinearity of the neuron's integrative power nor does one need to assume any particular form for intracortical circuitry. This is illustrated in simple cases, e.g. when the environment consists of only two different stimuli presented alternately in a random manner. The following formal statement then holds: the state of the system converges with probability 1 to points of maximum selectivity in the state space. We next consider the problem of early development of orientation selectivity and binocular interaction in primary visual cortex. Giving the environment an appropriate form, we obtain orientation tuning curves and ocular dominance comparable to what is observed in normally reared adult cats or monkeys. Simulations with binocular input and various types of normal or altered environments show good agreement with relevant experimental data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Marr, D. (1969) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008820 · Cited by 3,253
Cited by
The ART of adaptive pattern recognition by a self-organizing neural network
Carpenter, G. A., & Grossberg, S. (1988) · Computer · doi:10.1109/2.33 · Cited by 1,287
A history of spike-timing-dependent plasticity
Markram, H. (2011) · Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsyn.2011.00004 · Cited by 454
Vernon, D., Metta, G., & Sandini, G. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2006.890274 · Cited by 414
Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity: A Comprehensive Overview
Markram, H., Gerstner, W., & Sjöström, P. J. (2012) · Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsyn.2012.00002 · Cited by 369
Timing is not everything: neuromodulation opens the STDP gate
Pawlak, V. (2010) · Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsyn.2010.00146 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- BIENENSTOCK, E. L., COOPER, L. N., & MUNRO, P. W.
- Venue
- World Scientific Series in 20th Century Physics
- Publisher
- WORLD SCIENTIFIC
- Published
- 1995-09
- Pages
- 79-95
- ISSN
- 1793-1207 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1514711945
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.64
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THEORY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF NEURON SELECTIVITY: ORIENTATION SPECIFICITY AND BINOCULAR INTERACTION IN VISUAL CORTEX. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1142/9789812795885_0006
- The paper
- BIENENSTOCK, E. L., COOPER, L. N., & MUNRO, P. W. (1995). THEORY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF NEURON SELECTIVITY: ORIENTATION SPECIFICITY AND BINOCULAR INTERACTION IN VISUAL CORTEX. World Scientific Series in 20th Century Physics. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812795885_0006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.