The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Machine Proofs in Geometry: Automated Production of Readable Proofs for Geometry Theorems
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“With the introduction of DD10,17, area methods61 and full-angle methods30, geometry solvers use higher-level deduction rules than Tarski’s or Hilbert’s axioms and are able to prove a larger number of more complex theorems than those operating in formal languages.”
From Solving olympiad geometry without human demonstrations (2024) · cites this paper as [61]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Solving olympiad geometry without human demonstrations
Trinh, T. H., Wu, Y., Le, Q. V., He, H., & Luong, T. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06747-5 · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- Chou, S.-C., Gao, X.-S., & Zhang, J.-Z.
- Affiliations
- Wichita State University (US)
- Inst. of Systems Sci.
- Chendu Inst. of Computer Application
- Venue
- Series on Applied Mathematics
- Publisher
- WORLD SCIENTIFIC
- Published
- 1994-04
- ISSN
- 1793-0928 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3143504415
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.04
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Series on applied mathematics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Polynomial and algebraic computation
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Mathematics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematical and Computational Methods
- Keywords
- automated theorem proving, geometry, computer-assisted proof
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
