The DOI matches its Crossref record.
AN INTEGRATIVE APPROACH FOR MODEL DRIVEN COMPUTATION OF TREATMENTS IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE
Abstract
We present an overview of the current status of the European collaborative project PAEON. The challenge of PAEON is to provide specialists in reproductive medicine with a computerised model of the menstrual cycle under normal and various pathological conditions, which will allow them to get further insight in fertility dynamics. This model also enables the simulation of treatment protocols, which were used within in vitro fertilization. By the definition of virtual patients through biologically admissible parametrizations our approach allows not only the evaluation of a given treatment strategy in silico, but also the design and optimization of such protocols. Once a protocol is formalized in the virtual hospital, the success can be controlled by a treatment execution monitor, which works then as a clinical decision support system. All these tools will be combined in a virtual hospital environment, enabling the access to the PAEON services through the web.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior computational tools could only be applied to the downregulation phase before follicular stimulation because the feedback mechanisms from the ovaries to the pituitary were not implemented in the modified model.
“However, the tools could only be applied to the downregulation phase before follicular stimulation, because the feedback mechanisms from the ovaries to the pituitary were not implemented in the modified model.”
From Mathematical Modeling and Simulation Provides Evidence for New Strategies of Ovarian Stimulation (2021) · cites this paper as [39]
The model presented here could be used to compare the outcome of different treatment strategies in terms of specific success criteria.
“Moreover, the model presented here could be used to compare the outcome of different treatment strategies in terms of specific success criteria (e.g. average number of follicles larger than a threshold size at the end of the stimulation), similar to the approach in (39).”
From Mathematical Modeling and Simulation Provides Evidence for New Strategies of Ovarian Stimulation (2021) · cites this paper as [39]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mathematical Modeling and Simulation Provides Evidence for New Strategies of Ovarian Stimulation
Fischer, S., Ehrig, R., Schäfer, S., Tronci, E., Mancini, T., Egli, M., Ille, F., Krüger, T. H. C., Leeners, B., & Röblitz, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2021.613048 · Cited by 13
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- EHRIG, R., DIERKES, T., SCHÄFER, S., RÖBLITZ, S., TRONCI, E., MANCINI, T., SALVO, I., ALIMGUZHIN, V., MARI, F., MELATTI, I., MASSINI, A., KRÜGER, T. H. C., EGLI, M., ILLE, F., & LEENERS, B.
- Affiliations
- Zuse Institute Berlin (DE)
- Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
- Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts (CH)
- University Hospital Zurich (CH)
- ORCID
- Venue
- BIOMAT 2015
- Publisher
- WORLD SCIENTIFIC
- Published
- 2016-05-03
- Pages
- 67-88
- OpenAlex
- W4236926903
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Symposium on Mathematical and Computational Biology (BIOMAT) (publishedVersion)
- IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
- Keywords
- reproductive medicine, fertility dynamics, in vitro fertilization, virtual patients, virtual hospital, clinical decision support systems, treatment regimen optimization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review