The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World?
Abstract
AbstractThis paper derives equations for the value of bilateral trade from two extreme cases of the Heckscher-Ohlin Model, both of which could also represent a variety of other models as well. The first case is frictionless trade, in which the absence of all impediments to trade in homogeneous products causes producers and consumers to be indifferent among trading partners. Resolving this indifference randomly, expected trade flows correspond exactly to the simple frictionless gravity equation if preferences are identical and homothetic or if demands are uncorrelated with supplies, and they depart from that equation systematically when there are such correlations. The second case is of countries that each produce distinct goods, as in the H-O Model with complete specialization or a variety of other models. Expressions are derived for bilateral trade, first with Cobb-Douglas preferences and then with CES preferences. The standard gravity equation with trade declining in distance continues to be a central tendency for these trade flows, with departures from it that are easily understood in terms of relative transport costs. The main lessons from the paper are two. First, it is not all that difficult to justify even simple forms of the gravity equation from standard trade theories. Second, because the gravity equation appears to characterize a large class of models, its use for empirical tests of any of them is suspect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The WTO promotes trade, strongly but unevenly
Subramanian, A., & Wei, S.-J. (2007) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.07.007 · Cited by 866
Using the gravity equation to differentiate among alternative theories of trade
Feenstra, R. C., Markusen, J. R., & Rose, A. K. (2001) · Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique · doi:10.1111/0008-4085.00082 · Cited by 819
The currency union effect on trade: early evidence from EMU
Micco, A., Stein, E., & Ordonez, G. (2003) · Economic Policy · doi:10.1111/1468-0327.00109_1 · Cited by 526
Infrastructure, transport costs and trade
Bougheas, S., Demetriades, P. O., & Morgenroth, E. L. W. (1999) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/s0022-1996(98)00008-7 · Cited by 493
Of Hype and Hyperbolas: Introducing the New Economic Geography
Neary, J. P. (2001) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.39.2.536 · Cited by 481
Metadata
- Authors
- Deardorff, A. V.
- Venue
- World Scientific Studies in International Economics
- Publisher
- WORLD SCIENTIFIC
- Published
- 2011-07
- Pages
- 267-293
- ISSN
- 1793-3641 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3122354484
- Cited by
- 836
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 351.30
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1142/9789814340373_0024
- The paper
- Deardorff, A. V. (2011). Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World? World Scientific Studies in International Economics. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814340373_0024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.