REPRODUCIBLE RESEARCH WORKFLOW IN R FOR THE ANALYSIS OF PERSONALIZED HUMAN MICROBIOME DATA
Open accessAbstract
This article presents a reproducible research workflow for amplicon-based microbiome studies in personalized medicine created using Bioconductor packages and the knitr markdown interface.We show that sometimes a multiplicity of choices and lack of consistent documentation at each stage of the sequential processing pipeline used for the analysis of microbiome data can lead to spurious results. We propose its replacement with reproducible and documented analysis using R packages dada2, knitr, and phyloseq. This workflow implements both key stages of amplicon analysis: the initial filtering and denoising steps needed to construct taxonomic feature tables from error-containing sequencing reads (dada2), and the exploratory and inferential analysis of those feature tables and associated sample metadata (phyloseq). This workow facilitates reproducible interrogation of the full set of choices required in microbiome studies. We present several examples in which we leverage existing packages for analysis in a way that allows easy sharing and modification by others, and give pointers to articles that depend on this reproducible workflow for the study of longitudinal and spatial series analyses of the vaginal microbiome in pregnancy and the oral microbiome in humans with healthy dentition and intra-oral tissues.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The absence of standard operating procedures and accepted threshold values, especially for molecular methods, makes comparison and interpretation of results challenging.
“the absence of standard operating procedures (SOPs) and accepted threshold values, especially for molecular methods, make the comparison and the interpretation of the results challenging (Callahan et al., 2016).”
From Soil quality – A critical review (2018) · cites this paper as Callahan et al., 2016
Cites
Temporal and spatial variation of the human microbiota during pregnancy
DiGiulio, D. B., Callahan, B. J., McMurdie, P. J., Costello, E. K., Lyell, D. J., Robaczewska, A., Sun, C. L., Goltsman, D. S. A., Wong, R. J., Shaw, G., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1502875112 · Cited by 1,129 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Soil quality – A critical review
Bünemann, E. K., Bongiorno, G., Bai, Z., Creamer, R. E., De Deyn, G., de Goede, R., Fleskens, L., Geissen, V., Kuyper, T. W., Mäder, P., et al. (2018) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.030 · Cited by 2,960 · see citing works
- Authors
- CALLAHAN, B., PROCTOR, D., RELMAN, D., FUKUYAMA, J., & HOLMES, S.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Venue
- Biocomputing 2016
- Publisher
- WORLD SCIENTIFIC
- Published
- 2015-11-18
- Volume
- 21
- Pages
- 183-194
- PMC
- PMC4873301
- OpenAlex
- W2334395661
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 7.01
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing (PSB) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM086884, R01GM099534)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI112401, T32AI007328)
- National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01DE023113)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Keywords
- reproducible workflows, human microbiome, personalized medicine, amplicon sequencing, DADA2, phyloseq, knitr, Bioconductor, vaginal microbiota, oral microbiota, pregnancy
- MeSH terms
- Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Mouth, Pregnancy, Software, Vagina, Reproducibility of Results, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Computational Biology, Principal Component Analysis, Workflow, Precision Medicine, Microbial Consortia, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Microbiota
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review