Prototype-Guided Test-Time Adaptation for Real-Time EMG-Based Gesture Recognition
Open accessAbstract
Surface electromyography (sEMG) signals facilitate intuitive human–machine interaction and are widely employed in applications such as prosthetics and rehabilitation. However, sEMG signal distributions are highly sensitive to variations in electrode placement, user physiology, and session conditions, which significantly hinder model generalization in real-world settings. To address this, we propose EMG-based structure-aware test-time adaptive refinement (EMG-STAR), a test-time adaptation (TTA) framework tailored for online deployment without access to target data during training. EMG-STAR improves model stability by fusing historical and batch-wise normalization statistics from both source and target domains, effectively alleviating domain shifts. Furthermore, it refines predictions using a prototype-assisted feature clustering method that enforces consistency among semantically similar target samples. To further enhance reliability, the framework jointly leverages prediction confidence and distributional alignment to filter out noisy pseudo-labels during adaptation. Comprehensive evaluations conducted on two public datasets, Hyser, and NinaPro-DB2, demonstrate that EMG-STAR consistently outperforms ten existing TTA methods. Interpretability analysis using Grad-CAM reveals that EMG-STAR predominantly attends to physiologically meaningful muscle activation regions, suggesting that the model captures neuromuscular structures rather than transient signal noise.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29
- Authors
- Ma, Y., Wang, Y., Dai, C., & Guo, Y.
- Affiliations
- School of Information Science and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200240, P. R. China
- Lanzhou University (CN)
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences (CN)
- Venue
- International Journal of Neural Systems
- Publisher
- World Scientific Pub Co Pte Ltd
- Published
- 2026-10-10
- Pages
- 2750024-2750024
- ISSN
- 0129-0657 (ISSN-L)
- 1793-6462
- OpenAlex
- W7221334759
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- International Journal of Neural Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62503209)
- Gansu Province Science and Technology Program (26YFFA024, 25JRRA721)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
- Keywords
- surface electromyography, gesture recognition, test-time adaptation, domain shift, online deployment, pseudo-label filtering, distributional alignment, prediction confidence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review