Cited by 12Lattice Boltzmann Simulation StudiesFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics

Flow and heat transfer simulation with a thermal large eddy lattice Boltzmann method in an annular gap with an inner rotating cylinder

Gaedtke, Maximilian, Hoffmann, Tabitha, Reinhardt, Volkmar, Thäter, Gudrun, Nirschl, Hermann, Krause, Mathias J.·2019·International Journal of Modern Physics C

Abstract

In this study, a thermal Large Eddy Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM–LES) is applied to Taylor–Couette flow simulations, allowing detailed analysis of local heat transport over a wide range of Taylor numbers, including resolved transient Taylor vortices. The challenge in thermal management of electric motors is to control the temperature in the air gap between rotor and stator due to the gap’s small width and complex geometry, in which Taylor vortices strongly influence the heat transfer. This thin gap — here simplified by an annulus — is solved for the first time by a Thermal Lattice Boltzmann Method with a Smagorinsky sub-grid model. The influence of the rotational velocity of the inner cylinder with Taylor numbers from 36 to 511 — corresponding to a Reynolds number on the inner cylinder of up to 126[Formula: see text]000 — is numerically investigated. The simulations are validated on the basis of the global Nusselt number, where we find good agreement with a published measurement series, an empirical correlation and Finite Volume simulations using the SST turbulence model. Special attention is paid on predicting the critical Taylor number, which is reproduced almost exactly by Direct Numerical Simulations (DNS) with LBM, whereas LBM–LES slightly overestimates and the SST model further overestimates the occurrence of Taylor vortices.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/s012918311950013x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 12

Authors
Gaedtke, M., Hoffmann, T., Reinhardt, V., Thäter, G., Nirschl, H., & Krause, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
  • SEW Eurodrive (Germany) (DE)
Venue
International Journal of Modern Physics C
Published
2019-02
Volume
30
Issue
02n03
Pages
1950013
ISSN
  • 0129-1831 (ISSN-L)
  • 1793-6586
OpenAlex
W2915161022
Cited by
12
References
43
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Modern Physics C (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Keywords
Taylor-Couette flow, thermal lattice Boltzmann method, large eddy simulation, Smagorinsky model, heat transfer, Taylor vortices, critical Taylor number, annular gap, rotating cylinder, electric motor thermal management, air gap heat transfer, Nusselt number, SST k-omega turbulence model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review