Changes in EEG of children during brain respiration-training
Abstract
Brain Respiration (BR)-training is a unique form of breathing exercise that develops potential ability by facilitating brain function. It is recognized as an effective method of improving the scholastic aptitude and emotional stability of children. The present study was designed to investigate the characteristics of the EEG during this training. Spectral analysis was used to examine the relative power in the EEG of 12 children while they practiced BR-training, and these were compared to those of 12 matched controls. BR-trainees showed a lower theta rhythm than the controls before the training session began and lower beta2 power before, during and after the session. In contrast, the BR subjects showed greater relative alpha1 power than the controls in the left frontal region during BR-training, which persisted throughout the BR-training schedule. There is evidence that decreased theta and beta waves may be correlated with emotional maturation, whilst increased alpha waves are associated with educational achievement. These findings enhance our understanding of the neurophysiological basis of the effects of BR-training upon emotion and maturation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Meditation may improve detection ability, monitor immediate ventilatory needs and respiratory load, improve mental acuity, promote active participation in daily life activities, and achieve better self-care management of disease for anxious patients with COPD.
“It is concluded that meditation may improve detection ability, monitor immediate ventilatory needs and respiratory load, improve mental acuity, promote patients' active participation in daily life activities, and achieve better self-care management of disease for anxious patients with COPD.31–33”
From The efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions for patients with COPD: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol (2019) · cites this paper as [31]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 14
- Authors
- Kim, Y. Y., Choi, J. M., Kim, S. Y., Park, S. K., Lee, S. H., & Lee, K. H.
- Affiliations
- Department of Brain Science, The Korean Research Institute for New Human Science, 505 Shinsa-dong, Seoul, Korea
- Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
- Venue
- The American Journal of Chinese Medicine
- Publisher
- World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 02n03
- Pages
- 405-417
- ISSN
- 0090-2942 (ISSN-L)
- 0192-415X
- 1793-6853
- OpenAlex
- W2016297922
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Chinese Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Korea University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biofield Effects and Biophysics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Keywords
- breathing exercises, EEG changes, children, theta oscillations, beta oscillations, alpha oscillations, relative power, emotional maturation, academic performance, neurophysiological basis
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Breathing Exercises, Child, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Male, Case-Control Studies, Meditation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review