NEUTRINOLESS DOUBLE-BETA DECAY: A BRIEF REVIEW
Open accessAbstract
In this brief review we discuss the generation of Majorana neutrino masses through the seesaw mechanism, the theory of neutrinoless double-beta decay, the implications of neutrino oscillation data for the effective Majorana mass, taking into account the recent Daya Bay measurement of ϑ 13, and the interpretation of the results of neutrinoless double-beta decay experiments.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For a periodic Majorana neutrino, there are two solutions of V=0 for any value of mν,lightest allowed by experiment, mν,lightest ≳ 0.1 eV.
“Figure 14 corresponds to Majorana neutrino, and there are two solutions of V = 0 for any value of m ν,lightest allowed by the experiment, m ν,lightest 0.1 eV [50,51].”
From Weak gravity conjecture, multiple point principle and the standard model landscape (2017) · cites this paper as [51]
Section 4 (p. 12) discusses effective Majorana mass as a function of the lightest neutrino mass, and the Conclusions (p. 19) note that cancellations can occur in the normal mass scheme. Searches for periodic Majorana neutrinos and two solutions of V = 0 found no passage addressing those claims or the stated mν,lightest ≳ 0.1 eV condition. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 65
- [1]1. Super-Kamiokande, R. Wendell et al., Phys. Rev. D81 (2010) 092004, arXiv:1002.3471. · arXiv
- [2]2. SNO, B. Aharmim et al., (2011), arXiv:1109.0763. · arXiv
- [3]3. KamLAND, A. Gando et al., Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 052002, arXiv:1009.4771. · arXiv
- [4]4. K2K, M.H. Ahn et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 041801, hep-ex/0212007. · arXiv
- [5]5. MINOS, P. Adamson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 181801, arXiv:1103.0340. · arXiv
- [9]9. S.M. Bilenky, C. Giunti and W. Grimus, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 43 (1999) 1, hep-ph/9812360. · arXiv
- [13]13. C. Giunti, Phys. Lett. B686 (2010) 41, arXiv:1001.0760. · arXiv
- [14]14. DAYA-BAY, F.P. An et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 171803, arXiv:1203.1669. · arXiv
- [15]15. T2K, K. Abe et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 041801, arXiv:1106.2822. · arXiv
- [16]16. MINOS, P. Adamson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 181802, arXiv:1108.0015. · arXiv
- [17]17. DOUBLE-CHOOZ, Y. Abe et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 131801, arXiv:1112.6353. · arXiv
- [18]18. G.L. Fogli et al., (2008), arXiv:0809.2936, NO-VE 2008, IV International Workshop on 'Neutrino Oscillations in Venice' (Venice, Italy, April 15-18, 2008). · arXiv
- [19]19. A.B. Balantekin and D. Yilmaz, J. Phys. G35 (2008) 075007, arXiv:0804.3345. · arXiv
- [20]20. G. Fogli et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 141801, arXiv:0806.2649. · arXiv
- [21]21. H. Ge, C. Giunti and Q. Liu, Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 053009, arXiv:0810.5443. · arXiv
- [22]22. M. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni and J. Salvado, JHEP 04 (2010) 056, arXiv:1001.4524. · arXiv
- [23]23. Z. zhong Xing, Chin. Phys. C36 (2012) 281, arXiv:1203.1672. · arXiv
- [24]24. M. Mezzetto and T. Schwetz, J. Phys. G37 (2010) 103001, arXiv:1003.5800. · arXiv
- [25]25. LSND, A. Aguilar et al., Phys. Rev. D64 (2001) 112007, hep-ex/0104049. · arXiv
- [26]26. MiniBooNE, A.A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 181801, arXiv:1007.1150. · arXiv
- [27]27. G. Mention et al., Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 073006, arXiv:1101.2755. · arXiv
- [28]28. T.A. Mueller et al., Phys. Rev. C83 (2011) 054615, arXiv:1101.2663. · arXiv
- [29]29. P. Huber, Phys. Rev. C84 (2011) 024617, arXiv:1106.0687. · arXiv
- [30]30. C. Giunti and M. Laveder, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 217 (2011) 193, arXiv:1012.4356, NOW 2010, 4-11 September 2010, Conca Specchiulla (Otranto, Lecce, Italy). · arXiv
- [31]31. C. Kraus et al., Eur. Phys. J. C40 (2005) 447, hep-ex/0412056. · arXiv
- [32]32. Troitsk, V. Aseev et al., Phys. Rev. D84 (2011) 112003, arXiv:1108.5034. · arXiv
- [33]33. C. Giunti and C.W. Kim, Fundamentals of Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2007), ISBN 978-0-19-850871-7.
- [36]36. T. Yanagida, (1979), Workshop on the Baryon Number of the Universe and Unified Theories, Tsukuba, Japan, 13-14 Feb 1979.
- [38]38. S.M. Bilenky et al., Phys. Rep. 379 (2003) 69, hep-ph/0211462. · arXiv
- [39]39. S.R. Elliott and P. Vogel, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 52 (2002) 115, hep-ph/0202264. · arXiv
- [40]40. S.R. Elliott and J. Engel, J. Phys. G30 (2004) R183, hep-ph/0405078. · arXiv
- [41]41. I. Avignone, Frank T., S.R. Elliott and J. Engel, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80 (2008) 481, arXiv:0708.1033. · arXiv
- [42]42. S.M. Bilenky, Lect. Notes Phys. 817 (2010) 139, arXiv:1001.1946. · arXiv
- [43]43. W. Rodejohann, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E20 (2011) 1833, arXiv:1106.1334. · arXiv
- [44]44. J. Gomez-Cadenas et al., Riv. Nuovo Cim. 35 (2012) 29, arXiv:1109.5515. · arXiv
- [45]45. B. Schwingenheuer, (2012), arXiv:1201.4916, TAUP 2011. · arXiv
- [47]47. E. Ma, Phys.Rev.Lett. 81 (1998) 1171, hep-ph/9805219. · arXiv
- [48]48. S. Davidson, E. Nardi and Y. Nir, Phys. Rept. 466 (2008) 105, arXiv:0802.2962. · arXiv
- [53]53. F. Simkovic et al., Phys. Rev. C60 (1999) 055502, hep-ph/9905509. · arXiv
- [54]54. F. Simkovic et al., Phys. Rev. C77 (2008) 045503, arXiv:0710.2055. · arXiv
- [55]55. S. Hannestad, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 65 2010 (2010) 185, arXiv:1007.0658. · arXiv
- [56]56. F. Vissani, JHEP 06 (1999) 022, hep-ph/9906525. · arXiv
- [57]57. S.M. Bilenky, S. Pascoli and S.T. Petcov, Phys. Rev. D64 (2001) 053010, hep-ph/0102265. · arXiv
- [58]58. T. Schwetz, M. Tortola and J.W.F. Valle, New J. Phys. 13 (2011) 109401, arXiv:1108.1376. · arXiv
- [59]59. S. Bilenky, Introduction to the physics of massive and mixed neutrinos (Springer, 2010), Lecture Notes in Physics, Volume 817; ISBN 978-3-642-14042-6.
- [60]60. KATRIN, A. Osipowicz et al., (2001), hep-ex/0109033. · arXiv
- [62]62. K.N. Abazajian et al., Astropart. Phys. 35 (2011) 177, arXiv:1103.5083. · arXiv
- [63]63. V.A. Rodin et al., Phys. Rev. C68 (2003) 044302, nucl-th/0305005. · arXiv
- [64]64. V.A. Rodin et al., Nucl. Phys. A766 (2006) 107, arXiv:0706.4304. · arXiv
- [65]65. A. Bobyk, W.A. Kaminski and F. Simkovic, Phys. Rev. C63 (2001) 051301, nucl-th/0012010. · arXiv
- [67]67. T.R. Rodriguez and G. Martinez-Pinedo, Prog.Part.Nucl.Phys. 66 (2011) 436, arXiv:1012.1783. · arXiv
- [68]68. T.R. Rodriguez and G. Martinez-Pinedo, Phys.Rev.Lett. 105 (2010) 252503, arXiv:1008.5260. · arXiv
- [70]70. P. Rath, J.Phys.Conf.Ser. 322 (2011) 012019.
- [72]72. F. Iachello and J. Barea, Nucl.Phys.Proc.Suppl. 217 (2011) 5.
- [73]73. F. Iachello and J. Barea, AIP Conf.Proc. 1355 (2011) 7.
- [74]74. J. Menendez et al., J.Phys.Conf.Ser. 312 (2011) 072005.
- [75]75. J. Menendez et al., Nucl.Phys. A818 (2009) 139, arXiv:0801.3760. · arXiv
- [78]78. CUORICINO, E. Andreotti et al., Astropart. Phys. 34 (2011) 822, arXiv:1012.3266. · arXiv
- [79]79. NEMO, R. Arnold et al., Nucl. Phys. A765 (2006) 483, hep-ex/0601021. · arXiv
- [80]80. NEMO, A. Barabash et al., Phys.Atom.Nucl. 74 (2011) 312, arXiv:1002.2862, Fundamental Interactions Physics (ITEP, Moscow, November 23-27, 2009). · arXiv
- [82]82. GERDA Collaboration, C. Ur, Nucl.Phys.Proc.Suppl. 217 (2011) 38.
- [83]83. F. Bellini et al., Astropart. Phys. 33 (2010) 169, arXiv:0912.0452. · arXiv
- [84]84. KamLAND-Zen, Phys. Rev. C85 (2012) 045504, arXiv:1201.4664. · arXiv
- [85]85. EXO Collaboration, R. Gornea, J.Phys.Conf.Ser. 309 (2011) 012003.
- [86]86. A. Ibarra, E. Molinaro and S.T. Petcov, Phys. Rev. D84 (2011) 013005, arXiv:1103.6217. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Weak gravity conjecture, multiple point principle and the standard model landscape
Hamada, Y., & Shiu, G. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep11(2017)043 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
- Authors
- BILENKY, S. M., & GIUNTI, C.
- Affiliations
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (RU)
- INFN, Sezione di Torino, Via P. Giuria 1, I–10125 Torino, Italy
- ORCID
- BILENKY, S. M.
- Venue
- Modern Physics Letters A
- Publisher
- World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt
- Published
- 2012-04-30
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1230015
- ISSN
- 0217-7323 (ISSN-L)
- 1793-6632
- OpenAlex
- W2075000414
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 10.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Modern Physics Letters A (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Neutrino Physics Research
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Nuclear physics research studies
- Keywords
- neutrinoless double beta decay, Majorana neutrino masses, seesaw mechanism, neutrino oscillations, effective Majorana mass, theta13, Daya Bay, neutrino mass
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review