Cited by 28Handwritten Text Recognition TechniquesVehicle License Plate RecognitionAdvanced Neural Network Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

OFF LINE RECOGNITION OF HANDWRITTEN POSTAL WORDS USING NEURAL NETWORKS

BURGES, C.J.C., BEN, J.I., DENKER, J.S., LECUN, Y., NOHL, C.R.·1993·International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

We describe a method, “Shortest Path Segmentation” (SPS), which combines dynamic programming and a neural net recognizer for segmenting and recognizing character strings. We describe the application of this method to two problems: recognition of handwritten ZIP Codes, and recognition of handwritten words. For the ZIP Codes, we also used the method to automatically segment the images during training: the dynamic programming stage both performs the segmentation and provides inputs and desired outputs to the neural network. Results are reported for a test set of 2642 unsegmented handwritten 212 dpi binary ZIP Code (5- and 9-digit) images. For handwritten word recognition, we combined SPS with a “Space Displacement Neural Network” approach, in which a single-character-recognition network is extended over the entire word image, and in which SPS techniques are then used to rank order a given lexicon. We report results on a test set of 3000 300 ppi gray scale word images, extracted from images of live mail pieces, for lexicons of size 10, 100, and 1000. Representing the problem as a graph as proposed in this paper has advantages beyond the efficient finding of the final optimal segmentation, or the automatic segmentation of images during training. We can also easily extend the technique to generate K “runner up” answers (for example, by finding the K shortest paths). This paper will also describe applications of some of these ideas.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/s0218001493000340

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The cause of slow learning with too-small weights is that in weight space the origin is a fixed point of the learning dynamics and, although it is a saddle point, it is attractive in almost all directions.

    “The cause of this problem is that in weight space the origin is a fixed point of the learning dynamics and, although it is a saddle point, it is attractive in almost all directions [116].”

    From Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition (1998) · cites this paper as [116]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
BURGES, C. J. C., BEN, J. I., DENKER, J. S., LECUN, Y., & NOHL, C. R.
Affiliations
AT&T (United States) (US)
Venue
International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence
Published
1993-08
Volume
07
Issue
04
Pages
689-704
ISSN
  • 0218-0014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1793-6381
OpenAlex
W2030781528
Cited by
28
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Vehicle License Plate Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
handwritten word recognition, dynamic programming, graph-based segmentation, k-shortest paths

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review