FEATURE-BASED FACIAL EXPRESSION RECOGNITION: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS AND EXPERIMENTS WITH A MULTILAYER PERCEPTRON
Abstract
In this paper, we report our experiments on feature-based facial expression recognition within an architecture based on a two-layer perceptron. We investigate the use of two types of features extracted from face images: the geometric positions of a set of fiducial points on a face, and a set of multiscale and multiorientation Gabor wavelet coefficients at these points. They can be used either independently or jointly. The recognition performance with different types of features has been compared, which shows that Gabor wavelet coefficients are much more powerful than geometric positions. Furthermore, since the first layer of the perceptron actually performs a nonlinear reduction of the dimensionality of the feature space, we have also studied the desired number of hidden units, i.e. the appropriate dimension to represent a facial expression in order to achieve a good recognition rate. It turns out that five to seven hidden units are probably enough to represent the space of facial expressions. Then, we have investigated the importance of each individual fiducial point to facial expression recognition. Sensitivity analysis reveals that points on cheeks and on forehead carry little useful information. After discarding them, not only the computational efficiency increases, but also the generalization performance slightly improves. Finally, we have studied the significance of image scales. Experiments show that facial expression recognition is mainly a low frequency process, and a spatial resolution of 64 pixels × 64 pixels is probably enough.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The most difficult emotion to mimic accurately is fear, and this emotion is processed differently from other basic facial emotions.
“This is in accordance with Murthy (2009) and Zhang (1999), who found that the most difficult emotion to mimic accurately is fear and this emotion is processed differently from other basic facial emotions.”
From Towards multimodal emotion recognition in e-learning environments (2016) · cites this paper as Zhang (1999)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Recognizing action units for facial expression analysis
Tian, Y.-I., Kanade, T., & Cohn, J. F. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.908962 · Cited by 1,745 · see citing works
A review of affective computing: From unimodal analysis to multimodal fusion
Poria, S., Cambria, E., Bajpai, R., & Hussain, A. (2017) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2017.02.003 · Cited by 1,644 · see citing works
Zhi, R., Flierl, M., Ruan, Q., & Kleijn, W. B. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part B (Cybernetics) · doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2010.2044788 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Towards multimodal emotion recognition in e-learning environments
Bahreini, K., Nadolski, R., & Westera, W. (2016) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2014.908927 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
- Authors
- ZHANG, Z.
- Affiliations
- Microsoft Research, One Microsoft Way, Redmond WA 98052, USA
- Venue
- International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence
- Publisher
- World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 06
- Pages
- 893-911
- ISSN
- 0218-0014
- 1793-6381
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review