Cited by 96

FEATURE-BASED FACIAL EXPRESSION RECOGNITION: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS AND EXPERIMENTS WITH A MULTILAYER PERCEPTRON

ZHANG, ZHENGYOU·1999·International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

In this paper, we report our experiments on feature-based facial expression recognition within an architecture based on a two-layer perceptron. We investigate the use of two types of features extracted from face images: the geometric positions of a set of fiducial points on a face, and a set of multiscale and multiorientation Gabor wavelet coefficients at these points. They can be used either independently or jointly. The recognition performance with different types of features has been compared, which shows that Gabor wavelet coefficients are much more powerful than geometric positions. Furthermore, since the first layer of the perceptron actually performs a nonlinear reduction of the dimensionality of the feature space, we have also studied the desired number of hidden units, i.e. the appropriate dimension to represent a facial expression in order to achieve a good recognition rate. It turns out that five to seven hidden units are probably enough to represent the space of facial expressions. Then, we have investigated the importance of each individual fiducial point to facial expression recognition. Sensitivity analysis reveals that points on cheeks and on forehead carry little useful information. After discarding them, not only the computational efficiency increases, but also the generalization performance slightly improves. Finally, we have studied the significance of image scales. Experiments show that facial expression recognition is mainly a low frequency process, and a spatial resolution of 64 pixels × 64 pixels is probably enough.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/s0218001499000495

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most difficult emotion to mimic accurately is fear, and this emotion is processed differently from other basic facial emotions.

    “This is in accordance with Murthy (2009) and Zhang (1999), who found that the most difficult emotion to mimic accurately is fear and this emotion is processed differently from other basic facial emotions.”

    From Towards multimodal emotion recognition in e-learning environments (2016) · cites this paper as Zhang (1999)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ZHANG, Z.
Affiliations
Microsoft Research, One Microsoft Way, Redmond WA 98052, USA
Venue
International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence
Published
1999-09
Volume
13
Issue
06
Pages
893-911
ISSN
  • 0218-0014
  • 1793-6381
Cited by
96
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review