Cited by 23Chaos-based Image/Signal EncryptionCryptographic Implementations and SecurityChaos control and synchronization

Cryptanalysis of a chaotic stream cipher and its improved scheme

Lin, Zhuosheng, Yu, Simin, Feng, Xiutao, Lü, Jinhu·2018·International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos

Abstract

In this paper, the security performance for an 8D self-synchronous and feedback-based chaotic stream cipher with the low 8 bits of state variables for encryption is analyzed. According to known-plaintext attack and divide-and-conquer attack, only the second plain-pixel and its corresponding cipher-pixel are required to decipher the secret keys [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] by properly setting 64 different kinds of initial conditions. Then, according to chosen-ciphertext attack and divide-and-conquer attack, it is found that under the condition of selecting the ciphertext as zero, the original chaotic equation is degenerated as a linear one. So, by setting appropriate initial conditions, the secret keys [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] can be deciphered with only four iterative operations. As for the secret keys [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] multiplied by ciphertext and the secret keys [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] related to nonlinear functions, maybe a more powerful attack method is required for these secret keys to be deciphered. Finally, an improved chaotic stream cipher scheme equipped with the low 8 bits derived from nonlinear operation of multiple state variables for encryption is proposed for improving the ability to resist divide-and-conquer attack and chosen-ciphertext attack.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/s0218127418500864

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In [133], coefficients of the nominal matrix of a stream cipher based on an 8-D self-synchronous chaotic system can be derived in known-plaintext and chosen-ciphertext attack scenarios.

    “In [133], Lin et al. further derive coefficients of the nominal matrix of a stream cipher based on 8-D self-synchronous chaotic system in the scenarios of known-plaintext attack and chosen-ciphertext attack, respectively.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, Z., Yu, S., Feng, X., & Lü, J.
Affiliations
  • Guangdong University of Technology (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Feng, Xiutao
Venue
International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos
Published
2018-06-30
Volume
28
Issue
07
Pages
1850086
ISSN
  • 0218-1274 (ISSN-L)
  • 1793-6551
OpenAlex
W2884276405
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Chaos control and synchronization
Keywords
chaotic stream cipher, cryptanalysis, divide-and-conquer attack, known-plaintext attack, chosen ciphertext attack, key recovery, initial condition selection, image encryption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review