Cryptanalysis of a chaotic stream cipher and its improved scheme
Abstract
In this paper, the security performance for an 8D self-synchronous and feedback-based chaotic stream cipher with the low 8 bits of state variables for encryption is analyzed. According to known-plaintext attack and divide-and-conquer attack, only the second plain-pixel and its corresponding cipher-pixel are required to decipher the secret keys [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] by properly setting 64 different kinds of initial conditions. Then, according to chosen-ciphertext attack and divide-and-conquer attack, it is found that under the condition of selecting the ciphertext as zero, the original chaotic equation is degenerated as a linear one. So, by setting appropriate initial conditions, the secret keys [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] can be deciphered with only four iterative operations. As for the secret keys [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] multiplied by ciphertext and the secret keys [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] related to nonlinear functions, maybe a more powerful attack method is required for these secret keys to be deciphered. Finally, an improved chaotic stream cipher scheme equipped with the low 8 bits derived from nonlinear operation of multiple state variables for encryption is proposed for improving the ability to resist divide-and-conquer attack and chosen-ciphertext attack.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In [133], coefficients of the nominal matrix of a stream cipher based on an 8-D self-synchronous chaotic system can be derived in known-plaintext and chosen-ciphertext attack scenarios.
“In [133], Lin et al. further derive coefficients of the nominal matrix of a stream cipher based on 8-D self-synchronous chaotic system in the scenarios of known-plaintext attack and chosen-ciphertext attack, respectively.”
From When an attacker meets a cipher-image in 2018: A year in review (2019) · cites this paper as [133]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
When an attacker meets a cipher-image in 2018: A year in review
Li, C., Zhang, Y., & Xie, E. Y. (2019) · Journal of Information Security and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jisa.2019.102361 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
“In [133], Lin et al.”
- Authors
- Lin, Z., Yu, S., Feng, X., & Lü, J.
- Affiliations
- Guangdong University of Technology (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Feng, Xiutao
- Venue
- International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos
- Publisher
- World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt
- Published
- 2018-06-30
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 07
- Pages
- 1850086
- ISSN
- 0218-1274 (ISSN-L)
- 1793-6551
- OpenAlex
- W2884276405
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Chaos control and synchronization
- Keywords
- chaotic stream cipher, cryptanalysis, divide-and-conquer attack, known-plaintext attack, chosen ciphertext attack, key recovery, initial condition selection, image encryption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review