Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 760

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

EXPERIMENTAL DEMONSTRATION OF SECURE COMMUNICATIONS VIA CHAOTIC SYNCHRONIZATION

KOCAREV, Lj., HALLE, K. S., ECKERT, K., CHUA, L. O., PARLITZ, U.·1992·International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos

Abstract

Secure communications via chaotic synchronization is experimentally demonstrated using Chua's circuit. In our experiment the energy lost in the information-bearing signal is approximately 0.6 dBV. The reduction in chaotic signal after the recovery process is between -40 and -50 dBV.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/s0218127492000823

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 760

Metadata

Authors
KOCAREV, L., HALLE, K. S., ECKERT, K., CHUA, L. O., & PARLITZ, U.
Venue
International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos
Published
1992-09
Volume
02
Issue
03
Pages
709-713
ISSN
  • 0218-1274 (ISSN-L)
  • 1793-6551
OpenAlex
W2061695646
Cited by
760
References
0
FWCI
11.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EXPERIMENTAL DEMONSTRATION OF SECURE COMMUNICATIONS VIA CHAOTIC SYNCHRONIZATION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1142/s0218127492000823
The paper
KOCAREV, L., HALLE, K. S., ECKERT, K., CHUA, L. O., & PARLITZ, U. (1992). EXPERIMENTAL DEMONSTRATION OF SECURE COMMUNICATIONS VIA CHAOTIC SYNCHRONIZATION. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218127492000823

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.