The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE MULTIFRACTAL FORMALISM REVISITED WITH WAVELETS
Abstract
The multifractal formalism originally introduced for singular measures is revisited using the wavelet transform. This new approach is based on the definition of partition functions from the wavelet transform modulus maxima. We demonstrate that the f(α) singularity spectrum can be readily determined from the scaling behavior of these partition functions. We show that this method provides a natural generalization of the classical box-counting techniques to fractal functions (the wavelets actually play the role of “generalized boxes”). We report on a systematic comparison between this alternative method and the structure function approach which is commonly used in the context of fully developed turbulence. We comment on the intrinsic limitations of the structure functions which possess fundamental drawbacks and do not provide a full characterization of the singularities of a signal in many cases. We show that our method based on the wavelet transform modulus maxima decomposition works in most situations and is likely to be the ground of a unified multifractal description of singular distributions. Our theoretical considerations are both illustrated on pedagogical examples, e.g., generalized devil staircases and fractional Brownian motions, and supported by numerical simulations. Recent applications of the wavelet transform modulus maxima method to experimental turbulent velocity signals at inertial range scales are compared to previous measurements based on the structure function approach. A similar analysis is carried out for the locally averaged dissipation and the validity of the Kolmogorov’s refined similarity hypothesis is discussed. To conclude, we elaborate on a wavelet based technique which goes further than a simple statistical characterization of the scaling properties of fractal objects and provides a very promising tool for solving the inverse fractal problem, i.e., for uncovering their construction rule in terms of a discrete dynamical system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Multifractality in human heartbeat dynamics
Ivanov, P. C., Amaral, L. A. N., Goldberger, A. L., Havlin, S., Rosenblum, M. G., Struzik, Z. R., & Stanley, H. E. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/20924 · Cited by 1,456
Multiscale Analysis of Intensive Longitudinal Biomedical Signals and Its Clinical Applications
Nakamura, T., Kiyono, K., Wendt, H., Abry, P., & Yamamoto, Y. (2016) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2015.2491979 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- MUZY, J. F., BACRY, E., & ARNEODO, A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos
- Publisher
- World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt
- Published
- 1994-04
- Volume
- 04
- Issue
- 02
- Pages
- 245-302
- ISSN
- 0218-1274 (ISSN-L)
- 1793-6551
- OpenAlex
- W2032456190
- Cited by
- 572
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE MULTIFRACTAL FORMALISM REVISITED WITH WAVELETS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1142/s0218127494000204
- The paper
- MUZY, J. F., BACRY, E., & ARNEODO, A. (1994). THE MULTIFRACTAL FORMALISM REVISITED WITH WAVELETS. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218127494000204
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.