Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 572

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

THE MULTIFRACTAL FORMALISM REVISITED WITH WAVELETS

MUZY, J.F., BACRY, E., ARNEODO, A.·1994·International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos

Abstract

The multifractal formalism originally introduced for singular measures is revisited using the wavelet transform. This new approach is based on the definition of partition functions from the wavelet transform modulus maxima. We demonstrate that the f(α) singularity spectrum can be readily determined from the scaling behavior of these partition functions. We show that this method provides a natural generalization of the classical box-counting techniques to fractal functions (the wavelets actually play the role of “generalized boxes”). We report on a systematic comparison between this alternative method and the structure function approach which is commonly used in the context of fully developed turbulence. We comment on the intrinsic limitations of the structure functions which possess fundamental drawbacks and do not provide a full characterization of the singularities of a signal in many cases. We show that our method based on the wavelet transform modulus maxima decomposition works in most situations and is likely to be the ground of a unified multifractal description of singular distributions. Our theoretical considerations are both illustrated on pedagogical examples, e.g., generalized devil staircases and fractional Brownian motions, and supported by numerical simulations. Recent applications of the wavelet transform modulus maxima method to experimental turbulent velocity signals at inertial range scales are compared to previous measurements based on the structure function approach. A similar analysis is carried out for the locally averaged dissipation and the validity of the Kolmogorov’s refined similarity hypothesis is discussed. To conclude, we elaborate on a wavelet based technique which goes further than a simple statistical characterization of the scaling properties of fractal objects and provides a very promising tool for solving the inverse fractal problem, i.e., for uncovering their construction rule in terms of a discrete dynamical system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/s0218127494000204

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 572

Metadata

Authors
MUZY, J. F., BACRY, E., & ARNEODO, A.
Venue
International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos
Published
1994-04
Volume
04
Issue
02
Pages
245-302
ISSN
  • 0218-1274 (ISSN-L)
  • 1793-6551
OpenAlex
W2032456190
Cited by
572
References
0
FWCI
21.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE MULTIFRACTAL FORMALISM REVISITED WITH WAVELETS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1142/s0218127494000204
The paper
MUZY, J. F., BACRY, E., & ARNEODO, A. (1994). THE MULTIFRACTAL FORMALISM REVISITED WITH WAVELETS. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218127494000204

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.