Cited by 2,838Chaos control and synchronizationMathematical Dynamics and FractalsAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems

YET ANOTHER CHAOTIC ATTRACTOR

Open access
CHEN, GUANRONG, UETA, TETSUSHI·1999·International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos

Abstract

This Letter reports the finding of a new chaotic at tractor in a simple three-dimensional autonomous system, which resembles some familiar features from both the Lorenz and Rossler at tractors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/s0218127499001024

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Chen system has a chaotic attractor and two unstable equilibrium points.

    “Moreover, the Chen system has a chaotic attractor and two unstable equilibrium points.”

    From Chaos-Based Image Encryption: Review, Application, and Challenges (2023) · cites this paper as [19]

    Section 1, “The New Attractor,” reports a chaotic attractor for the Chen system. It says the system has three equilibria, but does not say that two are unstable. The paper’s copy therefore supports the attractor but not the stated number of unstable equilibrium points. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 3 · Cited by 2,838

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Chen, G. [1997] "Control and anticontrol of chaos," Proceedings of the First International Conference on Control of Oscillations and Chaos, COC'97, Augustb 27-29, 1997, St. Petersburg, Russia, pp. 181-186.
  2. Chen, G. & D. Lai [1998] "Feedback anticontrol of discrete chaos," International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 8, 1585-1590.
  3. Wang, X. F. & Chen, G. [1999] "On feedback anticontrol of discrete chaos," International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 9, July 1999, in press.

Authors
CHEN, G., & UETA, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Houston (US)
  • Tokushima University (JP)
Venue
International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos
Published
1999-07
Volume
09
Issue
07
Pages
1465-1466
ISSN
  • 0218-1274 (ISSN-L)
  • 1793-6551
OpenAlex
W2069436097
Cited by
2,838
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 95 · 2025: 114 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 134 · 2022: 131 · 2021: 150 · 2020: 137 · 2019: 120 · 2018: 140 · 2017: 140 · 2016: 174 · 2015: 153 · 2014: 135 · 2013: 159 · 2012: 124
FWCI
9.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Chaos control and synchronization
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
Keywords
chaotic attractors, three-dimensional autonomous systems, Lorenz attractor, Rössler attractor, chaotic dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review