Cited by 128Evolutionary Game Theory and CooperationExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models

Evolutionary dynamics of cooperation in a population with probabilistic corrupt enforcers and violators

Open access
Liu, Linjie, Chen, Xiaojie, Szolnoki, Attila·2019·Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences

Abstract

Pro-social punishment is a key driver of harmonious and stable society. However, this institution is vulnerable to corruption since law-violators can avoid sanctioning by paying bribes to corrupt law-enforcers. Consequently, to understand how altruistic behavior survives in a corrupt environment is an open question. To reveal potential explanations here, we introduce corrupt enforcers and violators into the public goods game with pool punishment, and assume that punishers, as corrupt enforcers, may select defectors probabilistically to take a bribe from, and meanwhile defectors, as corrupt violators, may select punishers stochastically to be corrupted. By means of mathematical analysis, we aim to study the necessary conditions for the evolution of cooperation in such corrupt environment. We find that cooperation can be maintained in the population in two distinct ways. First, cooperators, defectors, and punishers can coexist by all keeping a steady fraction of the population. Second, these three strategies can form a cyclic dominance that resembles a rock-scissors-paper cycle or a heteroclinic cycle. We theoretically identify conditions when the competing strategies coexist in a stationary way or they dominate each other in a cyclic way. These predictions are confirmed numerically.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/s0218202519500428

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Altruistic punishment is ineffective when the possibility arises for punishing the cooperators.

    “As far as altruistic punishment is concerned, it is ineffective when the possibility arises for punishing the cooperators, e.g., due to bribery42 or imperfect information43.”

    From Cooperation without punishment (2023) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Introduction (p. 2) says bribery can undermine punishment’s positive effect on cooperation. But the paper models defectors bribing enforcers to avoid punishment, not cooperators being punished; its Conclusions (p. 15) also say corruption can stabilize cooperation. It therefore does not support the claimed mechanism or an unqualified finding of ineffectiveness. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 68 · Cited by 128

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [57]A. Traulsen, T. R¨ ohl, and M. Milinski, An economic experiment reveals that humans prefer pool punishment to maintain the commons, Proc. R. Soc. B 279 (2012) 3716-3721.

Authors
Liu, L., Chen, X., & Szolnoki, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Institute for Technical Physics and Materials Science (HU)
Venue
Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences
Published
2019-10
Volume
29
Issue
11
Pages
2127-2149
ISSN
  • 0218-2025 (ISSN-L)
  • 1793-6314
OpenAlex
W2966555906
Cited by
128
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 1
FWCI
27.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61976048, 61503062)
  • Hungarian National Research Fund (K-120785)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Keywords
evolution of cooperation, public goods game, corruption, bribery, stochastic selection, cyclic dominance, heteroclinic cycles, coexistence of strategies, altruism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review