Single-channel EEG-based machine learning method for prescreening major depressive disorder
Abstract
Many studies developed the machine learning method for discriminating Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and normal control based on multi-channel electroencephalogram (EEG) data, less concerned about using single channel EEG collected from forehead scalp to discriminate the MDD. The EEG dataset is collected by the Fp1 and Fp2 electrode of a 32-channel EEG system. The result demonstrates that the classification performance based on the EEG of Fp1 location exceeds the performance based on the EEG of Fp2 location, and shows that single-channel EEG analysis can provide discrimination of MDD at the level of multi-channel EEG analysis. Furthermore, a portable EEG device collecting the signal from Fp1 location is used to collect the second dataset. The Classification and Regression Tree combining genetic algorithm (GA) achieves the highest accuracy of 86.67% based on leave-one-participant-out cross validation, which shows that the single-channel EEG-based machine learning method is promising to support MDD prescreening application.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Single-channel EEG analysis can effectively differentiate depression patients.
“By refining feature selection and classification models via genetic algorithms, it has been discovered that single-channel analysis can effectively differentiate depression patients, underscoring the potential for employing portable EEG devices in preliminary depression screening despite a noted limitation in clinical generalizability due to small sample sizes.”
From A Comprehensive Review on Synergy of Multi-Modal Data and AI Technologies in Medical Diagnosis (2024) · cites this paper as [130]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 24
- Authors
- Wan, Z., Zhang, H., Huang, J., Zhou, H., Yang, J., & Zhong, N.
- Affiliations
- Maebashi Institute of Technology (JP)
- Nanjing Forestry University (CN)
- Beijing University of Technology (CN)
- Capital Medical University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wan, Zhijiang
- Venue
- International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making
- Publisher
- World Scientific Pub Co Pte Ltd
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 05
- Pages
- 1579-1603
- ISSN
- 0219-6220 (ISSN-L)
- 1793-6845
- OpenAlex
- W2973729241
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Basic Research Program of China (2014CB744600)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61420106005)
- Beijing Natural Science Foundation (4164080)
- Beijing Outstanding Talent Training Foundation (2014000020124G039)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Keywords
- major depressive disorder, single-channel EEG, EEG classification, portable EEG, genetic algorithm feature selection, classification and regression trees
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review