EEG MARKERS FOR COGNITIVE DECLINE IN ELDERLY SUBJECTS WITH SUBJECTIVE MEMORY COMPLAINTS
Abstract
New treatments for Alzheimer's disease require early detection of cognitive decline. Most studies seeking to identify markers of early cognitive decline have focused on a limited number of measures. We sought to establish the profile of brain function measures which best define early neuropsychological decline. We compared subjects with subjective memory complaints to normative controls on a wide range of EEG derived measures, including a new measure of event-related spatio-temporal waves and biophysical modeling, which derives anatomical and physiological parameters based on subject's EEG measurements. Measures that distinguished the groups were then related to cognitive performance on a variety of learning and executive function tasks. The EEG measures include standard power measures, peak alpha frequency, EEG desynchronization to eyes-opening, and global phase synchrony. The most prominent differences in subjective memory complaint subjects were elevated alpha power and an increased number of spatio-temporal wave events. Higher alpha power and changes in wave activity related most strongly to a decline in verbal memory performance in subjects with subjective memory complaints, and also declines in maze performance and working memory reaction time. Interestingly, higher alpha power and wave activity were correlated with improved performance in reverse digit span in the subjective memory complaint group. The modeling results suggest that differences in the subjective memory complaint subjects were due to a decrease in cortical and thalamic inhibitory gains and slowed dendritic time-constants. The complementary profile that emerges from the variety of measures and analyses points to a nonlinear progression in electrophysiological changes from early neuropsychological decline to late-stage dementia, and electrophysiological changes in subjective memory complaint that vary in their relationships to a range of memory-related tasks.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Spectral data show higher alpha power in patients with subjective cognitive decline that is most strongly correlated with a decline in verbal memory performance and working memory reaction time.
“Indeed, spectral data have shown a higher alpha power in patients with SCD that was most strongly correlated with a decline in verbal memory performance and the working memory reaction time [171].”
From Neuroimaging advances regarding subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease (2020) · cites this paper as [171]
Cites
The sleep slow oscillation as a traveling wave
Massimini, M., Huber, R., Ferrarelli, F., Hill, S., & Tononi, G. (2004) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1318-04.2004 · Cited by 1,221 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neuroimaging advances regarding subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease
Wang, X., Huang, W., Su, L., Xing, Y., Jessen, F., Sun, Y., Shu, N., & Han, Y. (2020) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-020-00395-3 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Lista, S., Molinuevo, J. L., Cavedo, E., Rami, L., Amouyel, P., Teipel, S. J., Garaci, F., Toschi, N., Habert, M.-O., Blennow, K., et al. (2015) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-150202 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
- Authors
- ALEXANDER, D. M., ARNS, M. W., PAUL, R. H., ROWE, D. L., COOPER, N., ESSER, A. H., FALLAHPOUR, K., STEPHAN, B. C. M., HEESEN, E., BRETELER, R., WILLIAMS, L. M., & GORDON, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- Brown University (US)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Brain Resource Center (US)
- Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Integrative Neuroscience
- Publisher
- World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 05
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 49-74
- ISSN
- 0219-6352 (ISSN-L)
- 1757-448X
- OpenAlex
- W2156834076
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Integrative Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- subjective memory complaints, cognitive decline, early detection of Alzheimer's disease, EEG biomarkers, alpha power, biophysical model, verbal memory, working memory, executive function, thalamic inhibition, older adults
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Biophysics, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Predictive Value of Tests, Time Factors, Verbal Learning, Models, Statistical, Geriatric Assessment, Neural Networks, Computer, Biophysical Phenomena
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review