The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SPIDER: SOFTWARE FOR PROTEIN IDENTIFICATION FROM SEQUENCE TAGS WITH DE NOVO SEQUENCING ERROR
Abstract
For the identification of novel proteins using MS/MS, de novo sequencing software computes one or several possible amino acid sequences (called sequence tags) for each MS/MS spectrum. Those tags are then used to match, accounting amino acid mutations, the sequences in a protein database. If the de novo sequencing gives correct tags, the homologs of the proteins can be identified by this approach and software such as MS-BLAST is available for the matching. However, de novo sequencing very often gives only partially correct tags. The most common error is that a segment of amino acids is replaced by another segment with approximately the same masses. We developed a new efficient algorithm to match sequence tags with errors to database sequences for the purpose of protein and peptide identification. A software package, SPIDER, was developed and made available on Internet for free public use. This paper describes the algorithms and features of the SPIDER software.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Improved tools for biological sequence comparison.
Pearson, W. R., & Lipman, D. J. (1988) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.85.8.2444 · Cited by 11,227
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics
Aebersold, R., & Mann, M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01511 · Cited by 6,955
Cited by
Nesvizhskii, A. I. (2010) · Journal of Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2010.08.009 · Cited by 536
Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Histone Modifications
Huang, H., Lin, S., Garcia, B. A., & Zhao, Y. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500491u · Cited by 370
Diversity of Amyloid-beta Proteoforms in the Alzheimer’s Disease Brain
Wildburger, N. C., Esparza, T. J., LeDuc, R. D., Fellers, R. T., Thomas, P. M., Cairns, N. J., Kelleher, N. L., Bateman, R. J., & Brody, D. L. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-10422-x · Cited by 164
Angelescu, I.-R., Grosu-Tudor, S.-S., Cojoc, L.-R., Maria, G.-M., Chirițoiu, G. N., Munteanu, C. V. A., & Zamfir, M. (2022) · World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s11274-022-03408-z · Cited by 26
Paterson, S., Alonso-Pintre, L., Morato-López, E., González de la Fuente, S., Gómez-Cortés, P., & Hernández-Ledesma, B. (2025) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods14020252 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- HAN, Y., MA, B., & ZHANG, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
- Publisher
- World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 03
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 697-716
- ISSN
- 0219-7200 (ISSN-L)
- 1757-6334
- OpenAlex
- W1995229312
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SPIDER: SOFTWARE FOR PROTEIN IDENTIFICATION FROM SEQUENCE TAGS WITH DE NOVO SEQUENCING ERROR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1142/s0219720005001247
- The paper
- HAN, Y., MA, B., & ZHANG, K. (2005). SPIDER: SOFTWARE FOR PROTEIN IDENTIFICATION FROM SEQUENCE TAGS WITH DE NOVO SEQUENCING ERROR. Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219720005001247
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.