The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ferroelectricity versus Antiferroelectricity in the Solid Solutions of PbZrO3and PbTiO3
Abstract
The phase diagram of the solid solutions of PbZrO 3 –PbTiO 3 system has been established by investigating dielectric, dilatometric, calorimetric and structural properties. In Pb(Zr97–Ti 3 )O 3 four kinds of polymorphic modification have been found, that is, successively, the antiferroelectric, the other antiferroelectric, the ferroelectric and the paraelectric phases. By making use of the phase diagram and of the forced transition which causes a phase change from antiferroelectric phase to ferroelectric one owing to an influence of intense electric field, the free energies of these four states have been compared with one another as functions of temperature and the concentration of the solid solution. It is found that the antiferroelectric phase near the Curie point 230°C in pure PbZrO 3 is more stable than the ferroelectric one by only about 4 cal/mole; and with increasing concentration of PbTiO 3 the free energy of the ferroelectric phase decreases gradually at an initial rate of 0.5 cal. /mole/atomic percent. At the same time the two antiferroelectric phases lose their stability at the rates 5.8 cal./mole/atomic percent and 2.3 cal./mole/atomic percent respectively. The atomic arrangement in the ferroelectric Pb(Zr58–Ti42)O 3 has been examined. The sample of this concentration has the rhombohedral structure C 3 v 5 – R 3 m : The displacement of Pb atom relative to Zr or Ti atom is about 0.14 KX along the [111] direction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
BaTiO3-Based Piezoelectrics: Fundamentals, Current Status, and Perspectives
Acosta, M., Novak, N., Rojas, V., Patel, S., Vaish, R., Koruza, J., Rossetti, G. A., & Rödel, J. (2017) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/1.4990046 · Cited by 1,451
Current status and prospects of lead-free piezoelectric ceramics
Takenaka, T., & Nagata, H. (2005) · Journal of the European Ceramic Society · doi:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2005.03.125 · Cited by 868
Liang, Z., Yan, C.-F., Rtimi, S., & Bandara, J. (2019) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.09.028 · Cited by 689
Lattice dynamics ofBaTiO3,PbTiO3, andPbZrO3: A comparative first-principles study
Ghosez, P., Cockayne, E., Waghmare, U. V., & Rabe, K. M. (1999) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.60.836 · Cited by 465
Current Developments and Prospective of Lead-Free Piezoelectric Ceramics
Takenaka, T., Nagata, H., & Hiruma, Y. (2008) · Japanese Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1143/jjap.47.3787 · Cited by 422
Metadata
- Authors
- Sawaguchi, E.
- Venue
- Journal of the Physical Society of Japan
- Publisher
- Physical Society of Japan
- Published
- 1953-09
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 615-629
- ISSN
- 0031-9015 (ISSN-L)
- 1347-4073
- OpenAlex
- W2078224588
- Cited by
- 541
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ferroelectricity versus Antiferroelectricity in the Solid Solutions of PbZrO3and PbTiO3. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1143/jpsj.8.615
- The paper
- Sawaguchi, E. (1953). Ferroelectricity versus Antiferroelectricity in the Solid Solutions of PbZrO3and PbTiO3. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan. https://doi.org/10.1143/jpsj.8.615
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.